Literature DB >> 12799544

Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds.

K L Tremblay1, L Friesen, B A Martin, R Wright.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if naturally produced speech stimuli evoke distinct neural response patterns that can be reliably recorded in individuals.
DESIGN: Auditory cortical evoked potentials were obtained from seven normal-hearing young adults in response to four naturally produced speech tokens (/bi/, /pi/, /[U0283]i/, and /si/). Stimuli were tokens from the standardized UCLA version of the Nonsense Syllable Test (NST) ( Dubno & Schaefer, 1992). Using a repeated measures design, subjects were tested and then retested within an 8-day period.
RESULTS: Auditory cortical evoked potentials elicited by naturally produced speech sounds were reliably recorded in individuals. Also, naturally produced speech tokens, representing different acoustic cues, evoked distinct neural response patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: 1) Cortical evoked potentials elicited by naturally produced speech sounds can be reliably recorded in individuals. 2) Naturally produced speech tokens, representing different acoustic cues, evoke distinct neural response patterns. 3) Given the reliability of the response, this work has potential application to the study of neural processing of speech in individuals with communication disorders as well as changes over time after various types of auditory rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12799544     DOI: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000069229.84883.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  43 in total

1.  Reliability of early cortical auditory gamma-band responses.

Authors:  Mackenzie C Cervenka; Piotr J Franaszczuk; Nathan E Crone; Bo Hong; Brian S Caffo; Paras Bhatt; Frederick A Lenz; Dana Boatman-Reich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  The neural representation of consonant-vowel transitions in adults who wear hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Laura Kalstein; Cuttis J Billings; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

3.  Cortical evoked response to gaps in noise: within-channel and across-channel conditions.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lister; Nathan D Maxfield; Gabriel J Pitt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze Speech-Evoked Neurophysiological Responses.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Rachel Reetzke; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Stimulus presentation strategies for eliciting the acoustic change complex: increasing efficiency.

Authors:  Brett A Martin; Arthur Boothroyd; Dassan Ali; Tiffany Leach-Berth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Longitudinal Changes in Electrically Evoked Auditory Event-Related Potentials in Children With Auditory Brainstem Implants: Preliminary Results Recorded Over 3 Years.

Authors:  Shuman He; Holly F B Teagle; Tyler C McFayden; Matthew Ewend; Lillian Henderson; Nancy He; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Stability of the Cortical Sensory Waveforms, the P1-N1-P2 Complex and T-Complex, of Auditory Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Monica Wagner; Valerie L Shafer; Evis Haxhari; Kevin Kiprovski; Katherine Behrmann; Tara Griffiths
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Intracranial mapping of auditory perception: event-related responses and electrocortical stimulation.

Authors:  A Sinai; N E Crone; H M Wied; P J Franaszczuk; D Miglioretti; D Boatman-Reich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Electrically Evoked Auditory Event-Related Responses in Patients with Auditory Brainstem Implants: Morphological Characteristics, Test-Retest Reliability, Effects of Stimulation Level, and Association with Auditory Detection.

Authors:  Shuman He; Tyler C McFayden; Holly F B Teagle; Matthew Ewend; Lillian Henderson; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The electrically evoked auditory change complex: preliminary results from nucleus cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Carolyn J Brown; Christine Etler; Shuman He; Sara O'Brien; Sheryl Erenberg; Jae-Ryong Kim; Aayesha N Dhuldhoya; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.