Literature DB >> 21371824

Breast reconstruction in elderly women breast cancer: a review.

Lauren Walton1, Koshy Ommen, Riccardo A Audisio.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The elderly population is rapidly increasing, and with cancer, particularly breast cancer, being most prevalent in this group, its management is becoming increasingly important. A major aspect of breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life is the opportunity for reconstructive surgery post-mastectomy. This is particularly important as survival rates are improving, so a larger proportion of patients are living with the long term consequences of their treatment. Evidence has shown that age itself is not a risk factor for poor surgical outcomes, but concern over this causes surgeons to be wary of offering elderly patients the opportunity of reconstruction. Elderly patients themselves are also less likely to request or accept reconstruction.
METHODS: Literature searches using keywords 'breast reconstruction', 'older' and 'elderly' were carried out on Pubmed, Scopus and Google Scholar. Results were limited to English language, and then manually searched to exclude irrelevant articles. Duplicates were removed and a series of articles were reviewed.
RESULTS: Surgery was well tolerated in elderly patients, with complication rates comparable to a younger group. Autogenous tissue produced better outcomes than implant reconstruction. In areas such as social functioning and emotional wellbeing, patients with reconstructive surgery showed better outcomes than those without. DISCUSSION: The research on this topic is limited and only available in the form of case series. Direct comparison between these series cannot be drawn. The available series lack a clear assessment of the patient's frailty and do not define which patients should be offered breast reconstruction and which ones should be denied. Despite this, the evidence strongly suggests that it would be beneficial to offer elderly patients reconstructive surgery, dependent on their individual risk. A careful pre-operative assessment allows selecting the appropriate candidate on the basis of fitness, particularly when long and complex reconstructive procedures involving microvascular transfer such as DIEP or free TRAM flaps are considered. Reasons why patients decide to decline breast reconstruction may have altered more recently with wider media coverage and information especially on the internet. There are also real issues with availability of highly trained surgical teams capable of performing microsurgical transfer procedures, theatre availability and constraints due the present economic recession. Thus, there are multiple factors that influence breast reconstruction and patients, even in different parts of a single country, may have variations in the algorithm of options offered for breast reconstruction.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21371824     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev        ISSN: 0305-7372            Impact factor:   12.111


  12 in total

Review 1.  Choices in surgery for older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Vikram Swaminathan; Markos K Spiliopoulos; Riccardo A Audisio
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Breast reconstruction in the high-risk population: current review of the literature and practice guidelines.

Authors:  Margaret S Roubaud; Joseph N Carey; Emma Vartanian; Ketan M Patel
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

3.  Effect of Patient Age on Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: Results from a Multicenter Prospective Study.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Age and Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Luis Chang-Azancot; Pedro Abizanda; María Gijón; Nitzan Kenig; Manuel Campello; Jessica Juez; Antonio Talaya; Gregorio Gómez-Bajo; Javier Montón; Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 5.  Postmastectomy Reconstruction in Male Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Romina Deldar; Adaah A Sayyed; Parhom Towfighi; Nathan Aminpour; Olutayo Sogunro; Jennifer D Son; Kenneth L Fan; David H Song
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.269

6.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

7.  Single dual-trained surgeon for breast care leads to higher reconstruction rates after mastectomy.

Authors:  Ashkaun Shaterian; Salim C Saba; Brittany Yee; Christopher Tokin; Brian Mailey; Marek K Dobke; Anne M Wallace
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Prosthetic breast reconstruction: indications and update.

Authors:  Tam T Quinn; George S Miller; Marie Rostek; Miguel S Cabalag; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

9.  Breast reconstruction is a viable option for older patients.

Authors:  Utku C Dolen; Jody Law; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Reasons of not having breast reconstruction: a historical cohort of 1937 breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy.

Authors:  Delphine Héquet; Kevin Zarca; Sylvie Dolbeault; Benoît Couturaud; Charlotte Ngô; Virgine Fourchotte; Anne De La Rochefordière; Jean-Guillaume Féron; Alfred Fitoussi; Catherine Bélichard; Fabien Reyal; Fatima Laki; David Hajage; Brigitte Sigal; Bernard Asselain; Séverine Alran
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.