Literature DB >> 35927500

Age and Breast Reconstruction.

Luis Chang-Azancot1, Pedro Abizanda2,3, María Gijón4, Nitzan Kenig4, Manuel Campello4, Jessica Juez4, Antonio Talaya4, Gregorio Gómez-Bajo4, Javier Montón4,5, Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction is frequently offered to cancer patients who undergo mastectomy. Older women tend to have lower rates of reconstruction mostly due to an age-based discretion. We aimed to assess the safety of this surgery in this population.
METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent breast reconstruction following mastectomy between 2015 and 2020 at "Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete." Patients were classified according to age when the reconstruction process began (group A: < 65 years-group B: > 65 years). Differences in demographics and clinical data were analyzed using Student's t test and Chi-square test. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals (CIs) for surgical complications according to age group. Propensity-score matching was used as a sensitivity analysis to test consistency among results.
RESULTS: We included 304 women (266: group A-38: group B). Complete reconstruction was achieved in 48.1% of patients in group A vs 10.5% in group B (P < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, age was not associated with an increased risk of surgical complications, neither overall (OR 0.88, 95%CI 0.40-1.95), early (OR 1.35, 95%CI 0.58-3.13) nor late (OR 1.05, 95%CI 0.40-2.81). Radiotherapy and smoking history were significant predictors for complications in every setting.
CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, age at breast reconstruction is not associated with a higher risk of surgical complications, in contrast to radiotherapy and smoking history. Therefore, age should not be a limiting factor when considering breast reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction; Older women; Quality of life

Year:  2022        PMID: 35927500     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-022-03024-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.708


  46 in total

1.  The quality-of-life benefits of breast reconstruction do not diminish with age.

Authors:  Mark Sisco; Donald B Johnson; Chihsiung Wang; Kenneth Rasinski; Veronica L Rundell; Katharine A Yao
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Diminishing relative contraindications for immediate breast reconstruction: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Claudia R Albornoz; Peter G Cordeiro; Andrea L Pusic; Colleen M McCarthy; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Evan Matros
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Decision-making determinants for breast reconstruction in women over 65 years old.

Authors:  Julie Quemener; Jennifer Wallet; Loic Boulanger; Karine Hannebicque; Marie-Pierre Chauvet; Claudia Régis
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Cancer incidence in Spain, 2015.

Authors:  J Galceran; A Ameijide; M Carulla; A Mateos; J R Quirós; D Rojas; A Alemán; A Torrella; M Chico; M Vicente; J M Díaz; N Larrañaga; R Marcos-Gragera; M J Sánchez; J Perucha; P Franch; C Navarro; E Ardanaz; J Bigorra; P Rodrigo; R Peris Bonet
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Breast reconstruction in older women: advantages of autogenous tissue.

Authors:  Joan E Lipa; Adel A Youssef; Henry M Kuerer; Geoffrey L Robb; David W Chang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Outcomes of breast reconstruction in older women: patterns of uptake and clinical outcomes in a large metropolitan practice.

Authors:  Daniel D Oh; Kathy Flitcroft; Meagan E Brennan; Kylie L Snook; Andrew J Spillane
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 7.  Patterns and outcomes of breast reconstruction in older women - A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  D D Oh; K Flitcroft; M E Brennan; A J Spillane
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.424

8.  Assessment of advanced age as a risk factor in microvascular breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Eric I Chang; Luis Vaca; Andrew L DaLio; Jaco H Festekjian; Christopher A Crisera
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Surgical options for the early-stage breast cancer: factors associated with patient choice and postoperative quality of life.

Authors:  A Pusic; T A Thompson; C L Kerrigan; R Sargeant; S Slezak; B W Chang; K J Kelzlsouer; P N Manson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Breast reconstruction in the elderly: preserving excellent quality of life.

Authors:  John A Girotto; Jeffrey Schreiber; Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.