Literature DB >> 21339864

Sample Size Calculation for Clustered Binary Data with Sign Tests Using Different Weighting Schemes.

Chul Ahn1, Fan Hu, William R Schucany.   

Abstract

We propose a sample size calculation approach for testing a proportion using the weighted sign test when binary observations are dependent within a cluster. Sample size formulas are derived with nonparametric methods using three weighting schemes: equal weights to observations, equal weights to clusters, and optimal weights that minimize the variance of the estimator. Sample size formulas are derived incorporating intracluster correlation and the variability in cluster sizes. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate a finite sample performance of the proposed sample size formulas. Empirical powers are generally close to nominal levels. The number of clusters required increases as the imbalance in cluster size increases and the intracluster correlation increases. The estimator using optimal weights yields the smallest sample size estimate among three estimators. For small values of intracluster correlation the sample size estimates derived from the optimal weight estimator are close to that derived from the estimator assigning equal weights to observations. For large values of intracluster correlation, the optimal weight sample size estimate is close to the sample size estimate assigning equal weights to clusters.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21339864      PMCID: PMC3040008          DOI: 10.1198/sbr.2010.10021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res        ISSN: 1946-6315            Impact factor:   1.452


  12 in total

1.  Sample size calculations for clustered binary data.

Authors:  S H Jung; S H Kang; C Ahn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Nonparametric Sample Size Estimation for Sensitivity and Specificity with Multiple Observations per Subject.

Authors:  Fan Hu; William R Schucany; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Drug Inf J       Date:  2010

3.  A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data.

Authors:  J N Rao; A J Scott
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Extension of the rank sum test for clustered data: two-group comparisons with group membership defined at the subunit level.

Authors:  Bernard Rosner; Robert J Glynn; Mei-Ling T Lee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of site-specific diagnostic tests.

Authors:  P P Hujoel; L H Moulton; W J Loesche
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.419

6.  Statistical issues in analysis of diagnostic imaging experiments with multiple observations per patient.

Authors:  M Gönen; K S Panageas; S M Larson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Estimation and sample size considerations for clustered binary responses.

Authors:  E W Lee; N Dubin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis.

Authors:  A Donner; N Birkett; C Buck
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Effect of Imbalance and Intracluster Correlation Coefficient in Cluster Randomized Trials with Binary Outcomes.

Authors:  Chul Ahn; Fan Hu; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 1.681

10.  The Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired comparisons of clustered data.

Authors:  Bernard Rosner; Robert J Glynn; Mei-Ling T Lee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  3 in total

1.  Relative Efficiency of Unequal Versus Equal Cluster Sizes for the Nonparametric Weighted Sign Test Estimators in Clustered Binary Data.

Authors:  Chul Ahn; Fan Hu; Seung-Chun Lee
Journal:  Drug Inf J       Date:  2012-07-02

2.  Exact-Permutation Based Sign Tests for Clustered Binary Data via Weighted and Unweighted Test Statistics.

Authors:  Janie McDonald; Patrick D Gerard; Christopher S McMahan; William R Schucany
Journal:  J Agric Biol Environ Stat       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 1.524

3.  Reliability of Trained Dogs to Alert to Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Evan A Los; Katrina L Ramsey; Ines Guttmann-Bauman; Andrew J Ahmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.