Literature DB >> 22114363

Nonparametric Sample Size Estimation for Sensitivity and Specificity with Multiple Observations per Subject.

Fan Hu1, William R Schucany, Chul Ahn.   

Abstract

We propose a sample size calculation approach for the estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests with multiple observations per subjects. Many diagnostic tests such as diagnostic imaging or periodontal tests are characterized by the presence of multiple observations for each subject. The number of observations frequently varies among subjects in diagnostic imaging experiments or periodontal studies. Nonparametric statistical methods for the analysis of clustered binary data have been recently developed by various authors. In this paper, we derive a sample size formula for sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using the sign test while accounting for multiple observations per subjects. Application of the sample size formula for the design of a diagnostic test is discussed. Since the sample size formula is based on large sample theory, simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the finite sample performance of the proposed method. We compare the performance of the proposed sample size formula with that of the parametric sample size formula that assigns equal weight to each observation. Simulation studies show that the proposed sample size formula generally yields empirical powers closer to the nominal level than the parametric method. Simulation studies also show that the number of subjects required increases as the variability in the number of observations per subject increases and the intracluster correlation increases.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22114363      PMCID: PMC3221312          DOI: 10.1177/009286151004400508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Inf J        ISSN: 0092-8615


  13 in total

1.  Sample size and power calculations with correlated binary data.

Authors:  W Pan
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2001-06

2.  Sensitivity and specificity for correlated observations.

Authors:  P J Smith; A Hadgu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Extension of the rank sum test for clustered data: two-group comparisons with group membership defined at the subunit level.

Authors:  Bernard Rosner; Robert J Glynn; Mei-Ling T Lee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Sample size for cluster randomized trials: effect of coefficient of variation of cluster size and analysis method.

Authors:  Sandra M Eldridge; Deborah Ashby; Sally Kerry
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of site-specific diagnostic tests.

Authors:  P P Hujoel; L H Moulton; W J Loesche
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.419

6.  Statistical methods for the estimation of sensitivity and specificity of site-specific diagnostic tests.

Authors:  C Ahn
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.419

7.  Sample size calculations for studies with correlated observations.

Authors:  G Liu; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Estimation and sample size considerations for clustered binary responses.

Authors:  E W Lee; N Dubin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 9.  Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials.

Authors:  R J Hayes; S Bennett
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  The Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired comparisons of clustered data.

Authors:  Bernard Rosner; Robert J Glynn; Mei-Ling T Lee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sample Size Calculation for Clustered Binary Data with Sign Tests Using Different Weighting Schemes.

Authors:  Chul Ahn; Fan Hu; William R Schucany
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.452

2.  Relative Efficiency of Unequal Versus Equal Cluster Sizes for the Nonparametric Weighted Sign Test Estimators in Clustered Binary Data.

Authors:  Chul Ahn; Fan Hu; Seung-Chun Lee
Journal:  Drug Inf J       Date:  2012-07-02

3.  Comparison of operational characteristics for binary tests with clustered data.

Authors:  Minjung Kwak; Sang-Won Um; Sin-Ho Jung
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.373

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.