Literature DB >> 20084091

Effect of Imbalance and Intracluster Correlation Coefficient in Cluster Randomized Trials with Binary Outcomes.

Chul Ahn1, Fan Hu, Celette Sugg Skinner.   

Abstract

Cluster randomization trials are increasingly popular among healthcare researchers. Intact groups (called 'clusters') of subjects are randomized to receive different interventions and all subjects within a cluster receive the same intervention. In cluster randomized trials, a cluster is the unit of randomization and a subject is the unit of analysis. Variation in cluster sizes can affect the sample size estimate or the power of the study. Guittet et al. (2006) investigated the impact of an imbalance in cluster size on the power of trials with continuous outcomes through simulations. In this paper, we examine the impact of cluster size variation and intracluster correlation on the power of the study for binary outcomes through simulations. Because the sample size formula for cluster randomization trials is based on a large sample approximation, we evaluate the performance of the sample size formula with small sample sizes through simulation. Simulation study findings show that the sample size formula (m(p)) accounting for unequal cluster sizes yields empirical powers closer to the nominal power than the sample size formula (m(a)) for the average cluster size method. The differences in sample size estimates and empirical powers between m(a) and m(p) get smaller as the imbalance in cluster sizes gets smaller.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20084091      PMCID: PMC2747741          DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2008.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal        ISSN: 0167-9473            Impact factor:   1.681


  12 in total

1.  Confidence interval estimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary outcome data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou; Allan Donner
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Accounting for expected attrition in the planning of community intervention trials.

Authors:  Monica Taljaard; Allan Donner; Neil Klar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Statistical implications of the choice between a dichotomous or continuous trait in studies of interobserver agreement.

Authors:  A Donner; M Eliasziw
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Adjustment of frequently used chi-square procedures for the effect of site-to-site dependencies in the analysis of dental data.

Authors:  A Donner; D Banting
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  The large-sample relative efficiency of the Mantel-Haenszel estimator in the fixed-strata case.

Authors:  A Donner; W W Hauck
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Accounting for cluster randomization: a review of primary prevention trials, 1990 through 1993.

Authors:  J M Simpson; N Klar; A Donnor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Impact of the Cancer Risk Intake System on patient-clinician discussions of tamoxifen, genetic counseling, and colonoscopy.

Authors:  Celette Sugg Skinner; Susan M Rawl; Barry K Moser; Adam H Buchanan; Linda L Scott; Victoria L Champion; Joellen M Schildkraut; Giovanni Parmigiani; Shelly Clark; David F Lobach; Lori A Bastian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Analysis of site-specific data in dental studies.

Authors:  A Donner; D Banting
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  Results from a statewide approach to adolescent tobacco use prevention.

Authors:  D M Murray; C L Perry; G Griffin; K C Harty; D R Jacobs; L Schmid; K Daly; U Pallonen
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Reducing suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms in depressed older primary care patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Martha L Bruce; Thomas R Ten Have; Charles F Reynolds; Ira I Katz; Herbert C Schulberg; Benoit H Mulsant; Gregory K Brown; Gail J McAvay; Jane L Pearson; George S Alexopoulos
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sample Size Calculation for Clustered Binary Data with Sign Tests Using Different Weighting Schemes.

Authors:  Chul Ahn; Fan Hu; William R Schucany
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.452

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.