Literature DB >> 11719674

Statistical issues in analysis of diagnostic imaging experiments with multiple observations per patient.

M Gönen1, K S Panageas, S M Larson.   

Abstract

Many diagnostic imaging experiments are characterized by the presence of several observations for each patient studied. Evaluation of metastases with different imaging modalities in patients with cancer or examination of multiple artery segments in patients with heart abnormalities are some examples of such studies. Data obtained from multiple observations per patient are cluster correlated and should not be analyzed by using standard statistical methods because of correlations within a subject. In this article, positron emission tomographic studies are used as a framework to review statistical methods for the analysis of clustered data. Some simple statistical methods that account for correlation within a subject and that can be applied to conventional and well-known statistical methods, such as the chi(2) and t tests, are introduced. One of these methods is illustrated by using a brief analysis of data from a positron emission tomographic study, which demonstrates how resulting conclusions may be incorrect if appropriate techniques are not applied. Alternative methods that can handle multiple observations and dependency within a subject for diagnostic imaging studies are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11719674     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2212010280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  28 in total

1.  Modic type I change may predict rapid progressive, deforming disc degeneration: a prospective 1-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Liisa Kerttula; Katariina Luoma; Tapio Vehmas; Mats Grönblad; Eeva Kääpä
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A study of clustered data and approaches to its analysis.

Authors:  Sally Galbraith; James A Daniel; Bryce Vissel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Statistics and methodology.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski; Michael L Lieber
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Clinical value and limitations of [11C]-methionine PET for detection and localization of suspected parathyroid adenomas.

Authors:  Ken Herrmann; Toshiki Takei; Kakuko Kanegae; Tohru Shiga; Andreas K Buck; Jennifer Altomonte; Markus Schwaiger; Tibor Schuster; Kenichi Nishijima; Yuji Kuge; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Antibody mass escalation study in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer using 111In-J591: lesion detectability and dosimetric projections for 90Y radioimmunotherapy.

Authors:  Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Joseph A O'Donoghue; Michael J Morris; Eze A Wills; Lawrence H Schwartz; Mithat Gonen; Howard I Scher; Steven M Larson; Chaitanya R Divgi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Sample Size Calculation for Clustered Binary Data with Sign Tests Using Different Weighting Schemes.

Authors:  Chul Ahn; Fan Hu; William R Schucany
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.452

7.  Clinical assessment of MR-guided 3-class and 4-class attenuation correction in PET/MR.

Authors:  Hossein Arabi; Olivier Rager; Asma Alem; Arthur Varoquaux; Minerva Becker; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Minimizing individual variations in arterial enhancement on coronary CT angiographs using "contrast enhancement optimizer": a prospective randomized single-center study.

Authors:  Yoriaki Matsumoto; Toru Higaki; Takanori Masuda; Tomoyasu Sato; Yuko Nakamura; Fuminari Tatsugami; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Discrimination of HPV status using CT texture analysis: tumour heterogeneity in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Ji Young Lee; Miran Han; Kap Seon Kim; Su-Jin Shin; Jin Wook Choi; Eun Ju Ha
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Radiogenomics to characterize regional genetic heterogeneity in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Leland S Hu; Shuluo Ning; Jennifer M Eschbacher; Leslie C Baxter; Nathan Gaw; Sara Ranjbar; Jonathan Plasencia; Amylou C Dueck; Sen Peng; Kris A Smith; Peter Nakaji; John P Karis; C Chad Quarles; Teresa Wu; Joseph C Loftus; Robert B Jenkins; Hugues Sicotte; Thomas M Kollmeyer; Brian P O'Neill; William Elmquist; Joseph M Hoxworth; David Frakes; Jann Sarkaria; Kristin R Swanson; Nhan L Tran; Jing Li; J Ross Mitchell
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.