Literature DB >> 11427953

Sample size calculations for clustered binary data.

S H Jung1, S H Kang, C Ahn.   

Abstract

In this paper we propose a sample size calculation method for testing on a binomial proportion when binary observations are dependent within clusters. In estimating the binomial proportion in clustered binary data, two weighting systems have been popular: equal weights to clusters and equal weights to units within clusters. When the number of units varies cluster by cluster, performance of these two weighting systems depends on the extent of correlation among units within each cluster. In addition to them, we will also use an optimal weighting method that minimizes the variance of the estimator. A sample size formula is derived for each of the estimators with different weighting schemes. We apply these methods to the sample size calculation for the sensitivity of a periodontal diagnostic test. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate a finite sample performance of the three estimators. We also assess the influence of misspecified input parameter values on the calculated sample size. The optimal estimator requires equal or smaller sample sizes and is more robust to the misspecification of an input parameter than those assigning equal weights to units or clusters. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11427953     DOI: 10.1002/sim.846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

Review 1.  Sample size estimation in research with dependent measures and dichotomous outcomes.

Authors:  Kevin L Delucchi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Nonparametric Sample Size Estimation for Sensitivity and Specificity with Multiple Observations per Subject.

Authors:  Fan Hu; William R Schucany; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Drug Inf J       Date:  2010

3.  Sample Size Calculation for Clustered Binary Data with Sign Tests Using Different Weighting Schemes.

Authors:  Chul Ahn; Fan Hu; William R Schucany
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.452

4.  Comparison of operational characteristics for binary tests with clustered data.

Authors:  Minjung Kwak; Sang-Won Um; Sin-Ho Jung
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Effect of Imbalance and Intracluster Correlation Coefficient in Cluster Randomized Trials with Binary Outcomes.

Authors:  Chul Ahn; Fan Hu; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 1.681

6.  Pivotal Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence System for Autonomous Detection of Referrable and Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Eli Ipp; David Liljenquist; Bruce Bode; Viral N Shah; Steven Silverstein; Carl D Regillo; Jennifer I Lim; SriniVas Sadda; Amitha Domalpally; Gerry Gray; Malavika Bhaskaranand; Chaithanya Ramachandra; Kaushal Solanki
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

7.  Alterations in genes of the EGFR signaling pathway and their relationship to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor sensitivity in lung cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Jeet Gandhi; Jianling Zhang; Yang Xie; Junichi Soh; Hisayuki Shigematsu; Wei Zhang; Hiromasa Yamamoto; Michael Peyton; Luc Girard; William W Lockwood; Wan L Lam; Marileila Varella-Garcia; John D Minna; Adi F Gazdar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Design and analysis of trials with a partially nested design and a binary outcome measure.

Authors:  Chris Roberts; Evridiki Batistatou; Stephen A Roberts
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.