Literature DB >> 21328042

Remote patient management using implantable devices.

Colin Movsowitz1, Suneet Mittal.   

Abstract

Remote patient management utilizing the Internet is a milestone in the management of patients with an implantable cardiac device. Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) store diagnostic information about device and lead integrity, the occurrence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, and parameters that may reflect on a patient's heart failure status. Previously, these data could only be retrieved with a programmer at an in-person office visit. The introduction of remote follow-up and monitoring has changed the paradigm for the management of patients with implanted devices. Remote follow-up has been shown to be superior to traditional transtelephonic monitoring for the detection of clinically actionable events in pacemaker patients. Remote monitoring using ICDs with wireless technology has been demonstrated to result in detection of lead malfunction and atrial and ventricular arrhythmias while reducing the need for in-office evaluations without compromising patient safety. Studies are underway to evaluate the clinical utility of identification of atrial high-rate episodes and to identify patients at risk for exacerbation of heart failure. Remote monitoring technology has yet to be universally adopted by patients or physicians. Impediments to the implementation of remote monitoring including issues related to work flow and data management are explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21328042     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-011-9548-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  16 in total

1.  Transtelephonic monitoring of 25,919 implanted pacemakers.

Authors:  L S Dreifus; A Zinberg; P Hurzeler; A D Puziak; R Pennock; M Feldman; D P Morse
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) trial.

Authors:  Niraj Varma; Andrew E Epstein; Anand Irimpen; Robert Schweikert; Charles Love
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Instrumentation for the follow-up of pacemade patients. Telephone transmission of the electrocardiogram and self-check by the patient on pacemaker function and capture.

Authors:  A J Federico; F Giori; J N Bhayana; W M Chardack; S Michalek
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  The CONNECT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts.

Authors:  George H Crossley; Andrew Boyle; Holly Vitense; Yanping Chang; R Hardwin Mead
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Intrathoracic impedance monitoring in patients with heart failure: correlation with fluid status and feasibility of early warning preceding hospitalization.

Authors:  Cheuk-Man Yu; Li Wang; Elaine Chau; Raymond Hon-Wah Chan; Shun-Ling Kong; Man-Oi Tang; Jill Christensen; Robert W Stadler; Chu-Pak Lau
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Multicenter randomized study of anticoagulation guided by remote rhythm monitoring in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT-D devices: Rationale, design, and clinical characteristics of the initially enrolled cohort The IMPACT study.

Authors:  John Ip; Albert L Waldo; Gregory Y H Lip; Peter M Rothwell; David T Martin; Malcolm M Bersohn; Wassim K Choucair; Joseph G Akar; Mark S Wathen; Pooyan Rohani; Jonathan L Halperin
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  The relationship between daily atrial tachyarrhythmia burden from implantable device diagnostics and stroke risk: the TRENDS study.

Authors:  Taya V Glotzer; Emile G Daoud; D George Wyse; Daniel E Singer; Michael D Ezekowitz; Christopher Hilker; Clayton Miller; Dongfeng Qi; Paul D Ziegler
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-08-04

8.  Relationship of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias to volume overload: assessment by implanted transpulmonary impedance monitoring.

Authors:  Rajat Jhanjee; Grant A Templeton; Srinivasan Sattiraju; John Nguyen; Scott Sakaguchi; Fei Lu; Cengiz Ermis; Simon Milstein; Laura Van Heel; Keith G Lurie; David G Benditt
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-10

9.  Trial design of the clinical evaluation of remote notification to reduce time to clinical decision: the Clinical evaluation Of remote NotificatioN to rEduCe Time to clinical decision (CONNECT) study.

Authors:  George Crossley; Andrew Boyle; Holly Vitense; Lou Sherfesee; R Hardwin Mead
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Direct left atrial pressure monitoring in ambulatory heart failure patients: initial experience with a new permanent implantable device.

Authors:  Jay Ritzema; Iain C Melton; A Mark Richards; Ian G Crozier; Chris Frampton; Robert N Doughty; James Whiting; Saibal Kar; Neal Eigler; Henry Krum; William T Abraham; Richard W Troughton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  5 in total

1.  "We as Human Beings Get Farther and Farther Apart": the experiences of patients with remote monitoring systems.

Authors:  Abigale L Ottenberg; Keith M Swetz; Luke A Mueller; Samantha Gerhardson; Paul S Mueller
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.210

2.  Patient perspective on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: rationale and design of the REMOTE-CIED study.

Authors:  H Versteeg; S S Pedersen; M H Mastenbroek; W K Redekop; J O Schwab; P Mabo; M Meine
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Improved survival in patients enrolled promptly into remote monitoring following cardiac implantable electronic device implantation.

Authors:  Suneet Mittal; Jonathan P Piccini; Jeff Snell; Julie B Prillinger; Nirav Dalal; Niraj Varma
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable devices in the pediatric population improves detection of adverse events.

Authors:  Lindsey E Malloy; Jean Gingerich; Mark D Olson; Dianne L Atkins
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 5.  Telehealth for Pediatric Cardiology Practitioners in the Time of COVID-19.

Authors:  Devyani Chowdhury; Kyle D Hope; Lindsay C Arthur; Sharon M Weinberger; Christina Ronai; Jonathan N Johnson; Christopher S Snyder
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 1.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.