Literature DB >> 19699858

Multicenter randomized study of anticoagulation guided by remote rhythm monitoring in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT-D devices: Rationale, design, and clinical characteristics of the initially enrolled cohort The IMPACT study.

John Ip1, Albert L Waldo, Gregory Y H Lip, Peter M Rothwell, David T Martin, Malcolm M Bersohn, Wassim K Choucair, Joseph G Akar, Mark S Wathen, Pooyan Rohani, Jonathan L Halperin.   

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter are common cardiac arrhythmias associated with an increased risk of stroke in patients with additional risk factors. Anticoagulation ameliorates stroke risk, but because these arrhythmias may occur intermittently without symptoms, initiation of prophylactic therapy is often delayed until electrocardiographic documentation is obtained. The IMPACT study is a multicenter, randomized trial of remote surveillance technology in patients with implanted dual-chamber cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) devices designed to test the hypothesis that initiation and withdrawal of oral anticoagulant therapy guided by continuous ambulatory monitoring of the atrial electrogram improve clinical outcomes by reducing the combined rate of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding compared with conventional clinical management. For those in the intervention group, early detection of atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) generates an automatic alert to initiate anticoagulation based on patient-specific stroke risk stratification. Subsequently, freedom from AHRE for predefined periods prompts withdrawal of anticoagulation to avoid bleeding. Patients in the control arm are managed conventionally, the anticoagulation decision prompted by incidental detection of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter during routine clinical follow-up. The results will help define the clinical utility of wireless remote cardiac rhythm surveillance and help establish the critical threshold of AHRE burden warranting anticoagulant therapy in patients at risk of stroke. In this report, we describe the study design and baseline demographic and clinical features of the initial cohort (227 patients).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19699858     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  26 in total

1.  Inappropriate mode switching clarified by using a chest radiograph.

Authors:  Brian Marino; Abhishek Jaiswal; Seth Goldbarg
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2015-02-14

2.  [Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Is remote monitoring obligatory?].

Authors:  Fritz W Horlbeck; J O Schwab
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-04-22

3.  AF Detected on Implanted Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Is There a Threshold for Thromboembolic Risk?

Authors:  Motaz Baibars; Khalil Kanjwal; Joseph E Marine
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-03

Review 4.  Silent atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, diagnosis, and clinical impact.

Authors:  Polychronis E Dilaveris; Harold L Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 5.  Stroke Prevention for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Beyond the Guidelines.

Authors:  William F McIntyre; Jeff Healey
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-04-30

6.  Stroke: finding atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke.

Authors:  Debleena Pain; Jonathan L Halperin
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 7.  Should Atrial Fibrillation Burden Be A Feature to Guide Thromboembolism Prophylaxis?

Authors:  Molly Sachdev; Emile G Daoud
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-08-20

Review 8.  The Temporal Relationship Between Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Paul D Ziegler
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-02-12

Review 9.  Subclinical Atrial Tachyarrhythmias:Implantable Devices and Remote Monitoring.

Authors:  Elia De Maria; Daniele Giacopelli
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 10.  Monitoring Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation.

Authors:  Giovanni B Forleo; Michela Casella; Antonio Dello Russo; Massimo Moltrasio; Gaetano Fassini; Manfredi Tesauro; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.