Literature DB >> 21325028

Drosophila male germline stem cells do not asymmetrically segregate chromosome strands.

Swathi Yadlapalli1, Jun Cheng, Yukiko M Yamashita.   

Abstract

Adult stem cells continuously supply differentiated cells throughout the life of organisms. This increases the risk of replicative senescence or neoplastic transformation due to mutations that accumulate over many rounds of DNA replication. The immortal strand hypothesis proposes that stem cells reduce the accumulation of replication-induced mutations by retaining the older template DNA strands. Other models have also been proposed in which stem cells asymmetrically segregate chromosome strands for other reasons, such as retention of epigenetic memories. Recently, the idea has emerged that the mother centrosome, which is stereotypically retained within some asymmetrically dividing stem cells, might be utilized as a means of asymmetrically segregating chromosome strands. We have tested this hypothesis in germline stem cells (GSCs) from Drosophila melanogaster testis, which undergo asymmetric divisions marked by the asymmetric segregation of centrosomes and the acquisition of distinct daughter cell fates (stem cell self-renewal versus differentiation). Using 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine labeling combined with direct visualization of GSC-gonialblast (differentiating daughter) pairs, we directly scored the outcome of chromosome strand segregation. Our data show that, in male GSCs in the Drosophila testis, chromosome strands are not asymmetrically segregated, despite asymmetrically segregating centrosomes. Our data demonstrate that asymmetric centrosome segregation in stem cells does not necessarily lead to asymmetric chromosome strand segregation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21325028      PMCID: PMC3048890          DOI: 10.1242/jcs.079798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  40 in total

1.  Control of stem cell self-renewal in Drosophila spermatogenesis by JAK-STAT signaling.

Authors:  N Tulina; E Matunis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Asymmetric inheritance of centrosomally localized mRNAs during embryonic cleavages.

Authors:  J David Lambert; Lisa M Nagy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-12-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Cosegregation of chromosomes containing immortal DNA strands in cells that cycle with asymmetric stem cell kinetics.

Authors:  Joshua R Merok; Janice A Lansita; James R Tunstead; James L Sherley
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Stem cell self-renewal specified by JAK-STAT activation in response to a support cell cue.

Authors:  A A Kiger; D L Jones; C Schulz; M B Rogers; M T Fuller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Discovery of the mitotic selective chromatid segregation phenomenon and its implications for vertebrate development.

Authors:  A Armakolas; M Koutsilieris; A J S Klar
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 6.  Does S. pombe exploit the intrinsic asymmetry of DNA synthesis to imprint daughter cells for mating-type switching?

Authors:  J Z Dalgaard; A J Klar
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Orientation of asymmetric stem cell division by the APC tumor suppressor and centrosome.

Authors:  Yukiko M Yamashita; D Leanne Jones; Margaret T Fuller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Localization of Pavarotti-KLP in living Drosophila embryos suggests roles in reorganizing the cortical cytoskeleton during the mitotic cycle.

Authors:  Gianluca Minestrini; Alyssa S Harley; David M Glover
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands.

Authors:  Christopher S Potten; Gary Owen; Dawn Booth
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M D Adams; S E Celniker; R A Holt; C A Evans; J D Gocayne; P G Amanatides; S E Scherer; P W Li; R A Hoskins; R F Galle; R A George; S E Lewis; S Richards; M Ashburner; S N Henderson; G G Sutton; J R Wortman; M D Yandell; Q Zhang; L X Chen; R C Brandon; Y H Rogers; R G Blazej; M Champe; B D Pfeiffer; K H Wan; C Doyle; E G Baxter; G Helt; C R Nelson; G L Gabor; J F Abril; A Agbayani; H J An; C Andrews-Pfannkoch; D Baldwin; R M Ballew; A Basu; J Baxendale; L Bayraktaroglu; E M Beasley; K Y Beeson; P V Benos; B P Berman; D Bhandari; S Bolshakov; D Borkova; M R Botchan; J Bouck; P Brokstein; P Brottier; K C Burtis; D A Busam; H Butler; E Cadieu; A Center; I Chandra; J M Cherry; S Cawley; C Dahlke; L B Davenport; P Davies; B de Pablos; A Delcher; Z Deng; A D Mays; I Dew; S M Dietz; K Dodson; L E Doup; M Downes; S Dugan-Rocha; B C Dunkov; P Dunn; K J Durbin; C C Evangelista; C Ferraz; S Ferriera; W Fleischmann; C Fosler; A E Gabrielian; N S Garg; W M Gelbart; K Glasser; A Glodek; F Gong; J H Gorrell; Z Gu; P Guan; M Harris; N L Harris; D Harvey; T J Heiman; J R Hernandez; J Houck; D Hostin; K A Houston; T J Howland; M H Wei; C Ibegwam; M Jalali; F Kalush; G H Karpen; Z Ke; J A Kennison; K A Ketchum; B E Kimmel; C D Kodira; C Kraft; S Kravitz; D Kulp; Z Lai; P Lasko; Y Lei; A A Levitsky; J Li; Z Li; Y Liang; X Lin; X Liu; B Mattei; T C McIntosh; M P McLeod; D McPherson; G Merkulov; N V Milshina; C Mobarry; J Morris; A Moshrefi; S M Mount; M Moy; B Murphy; L Murphy; D M Muzny; D L Nelson; D R Nelson; K A Nelson; K Nixon; D R Nusskern; J M Pacleb; M Palazzolo; G S Pittman; S Pan; J Pollard; V Puri; M G Reese; K Reinert; K Remington; R D Saunders; F Scheeler; H Shen; B C Shue; I Sidén-Kiamos; M Simpson; M P Skupski; T Smith; E Spier; A C Spradling; M Stapleton; R Strong; E Sun; R Svirskas; C Tector; R Turner; E Venter; A H Wang; X Wang; Z Y Wang; D A Wassarman; G M Weinstock; J Weissenbach; S M Williams; K C Worley; D Wu; S Yang; Q A Yao; J Ye; R F Yeh; J S Zaveri; M Zhan; G Zhang; Q Zhao; L Zheng; X H Zheng; F N Zhong; W Zhong; X Zhou; S Zhu; X Zhu; H O Smith; R A Gibbs; E W Myers; G M Rubin; J C Venter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  When stem cells grow old: phenotypes and mechanisms of stem cell aging.

Authors:  Michael B Schultz; David A Sinclair
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 2.  DNA asymmetry in stem cells - immortal or mortal?

Authors:  Swathi Yadlapalli; Yukiko M Yamashita
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 3.  Epigenetic regulation of germ cells-remember or forget?

Authors:  Lijuan Feng; Xin Chen
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 4.  Nonrandom sister chromatid segregation of sex chromosomes in Drosophila male germline stem cells.

Authors:  Yukiko M Yamashita
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Asymmetric Centromeres Differentially Coordinate with Mitotic Machinery to Ensure Biased Sister Chromatid Segregation in Germline Stem Cells.

Authors:  Rajesh Ranjan; Jonathan Snedeker; Xin Chen
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  Sister chromatids segregate at mitosis without mother-daughter bias in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Brice E Keyes; Kenneth D Sykes; Courtney E Remington; Daniel J Burke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Protecting and Diversifying the Germline.

Authors:  Ryan J Gleason; Amit Anand; Toshie Kai; Xin Chen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Lineage tracing quantification reveals symmetric stem cell division in Drosophila male germline stem cells.

Authors:  Viktoria Salzmann; Mayu Inaba; Jun Cheng; Yukiko M Yamashita
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.321

Review 9.  Unbiased segregation of fission yeast chromosome 2 strands to daughter cells.

Authors:  Amar J S Klar; Michael J Bonaduce
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 10.  Adult hair follicle stem cells do not retain the older DNA strands in vivo during normal tissue homeostasis.

Authors:  Sanjeev K Waghmare; Tudorita Tumbar
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.