Literature DB >> 23051643

Sister chromatids segregate at mitosis without mother-daughter bias in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Brice E Keyes1, Kenneth D Sykes, Courtney E Remington, Daniel J Burke.   

Abstract

There is evidence accumulating for nonrandom segregation of one or more chromosomes during mitosis in different cell types. We use cell synchrony and two methods to show that all chromatids of budding yeast segregate randomly and that there is no mother-daughter bias with respect to Watson and Crick-containing strands of DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23051643      PMCID: PMC3512160          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.145680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  26 in total

1.  Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer.

Authors:  J Cairns
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Crowd control in the crypt.

Authors:  Catherine Booth; Gerard Brady; Christopher S Potten
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Cosegregation of chromosomes containing immortal DNA strands in cells that cycle with asymmetric stem cell kinetics.

Authors:  Joshua R Merok; Janice A Lansita; James R Tunstead; James L Sherley
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Random segregation of chromatids at mitosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M W Neff; D J Burke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Left-right dynein motor implicated in selective chromatid segregation in mouse cells.

Authors:  Athanasios Armakolas; Amar J S Klar
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Cell type regulates selective segregation of mouse chromosome 7 DNA strands in mitosis.

Authors:  Athanasios Armakolas; Amar J S Klar
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  The immortal strand hypothesis: segregation and reconstruction.

Authors:  Thomas A Rando
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Immortal strands? Give me a break.

Authors:  Peter M Lansdorp
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny.

Authors:  Michael J Conboy; Ariela O Karasov; Thomas A Rando
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro.

Authors:  Phillip Karpowicz; Cindi Morshead; Angela Kam; Eric Jervis; John Ramunas; John Ramuns; Vincent Cheng; Derek van der Kooy
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Unbiased segregation of yeast chromatids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Daniel J Burke
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 2.  Unbiased segregation of fission yeast chromosome 2 strands to daughter cells.

Authors:  Amar J S Klar; Michael J Bonaduce
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Biochemical evidence for diverse strategies in the inner kinetochore.

Authors:  G E Hamilton; T N Davis
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.