Literature DB >> 23970416

DNA asymmetry in stem cells - immortal or mortal?

Swathi Yadlapalli1, Yukiko M Yamashita.   

Abstract

The immortal strand hypothesis proposes that stem cells retain a template copy of genomic DNA (i.e. an 'immortal strand') to avoid replication-induced mutations. An alternative hypothesis suggests that certain cells segregate sister chromatids non-randomly to transmit distinct epigenetic information. However, this area of research has been highly controversial, with conflicting data even from the same cell types. Moreover, historically, the same term of 'non-random sister chromatid segregation' or 'biased sister chromatid segregation' has been used to indicate distinct biological processes, generating a confusion in the biological significance and potential mechanism of each phenomenon. Here, we discuss the models of non-random sister chromatid segregation, and we explore the strengths and limitations of the various techniques and experimental model systems used to study this question. We also describe our recent study on Drosophila male germline stem cells, where sister chromatids of X and Y chromosomes are segregated non-randomly during cell division. We aim to integrate the existing evidence to speculate on the underlying mechanisms and biological relevance of this long-standing observation on non-random sister chromatid segregation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymmetric cell division; Drosophila; Immortal strand hypothesis; Niche; Stem cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23970416      PMCID: PMC3772383          DOI: 10.1242/jcs.096024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  54 in total

1.  Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer.

Authors:  J Cairns
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Regeneration of male germline stem cells by spermatogonial dedifferentiation in vivo.

Authors:  Crista Brawley; Erika Matunis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The mother-daughter mating type switching asymmetry of budding yeast is not conferred by the segregation of parental HO gene DNA strands.

Authors:  A J Klar
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  A Dnmt2-like protein mediates DNA methylation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Natascha Kunert; Joachim Marhold; Jonas Stanke; Dirk Stach; Frank Lyko
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 5.  Biased DNA segregation in Drosophila male germline stem cells.

Authors:  Yukiko M Yamashita
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 7.727

6.  Double-stranded RNA-mediated silencing of genomic tandem repeats and transposable elements in the D. melanogaster germline.

Authors:  A A Aravin; N M Naumova; A V Tulin; V V Vagin; Y M Rozovsky; V A Gvozdev
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Differentiated parental DNA strands confer developmental asymmetry on daughter cells in fission yeast.

Authors:  A J Klar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Apr 2-8       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Orientation of asymmetric stem cell division by the APC tumor suppressor and centrosome.

Authors:  Yukiko M Yamashita; D Leanne Jones; Margaret T Fuller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Fine mapping of satellite DNA sequences along the Y chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster: relationships between satellite sequences and fertility factors.

Authors:  S Bonaccorsi; A Lohe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Strand-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization: the CO-FISH family.

Authors:  S M Bailey; E H Goodwin; M N Cornforth
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Novel Class of Human Cardiac Stem Cells.

Authors:  Tiziano Moccetti; Annarosa Leri; Polina Goichberg; Marcello Rota; Piero Anversa
Journal:  Cardiol Rev       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 2.  Taking the road less traveled - the therapeutic potential of CBP/β-catenin antagonists.

Authors:  Michael Kahn
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 6.902

Review 3.  Drosophila as a Model System for Studying of the Evolution and Functional Specialization of the Y Chromosome.

Authors:  Alexei A Kotov; Sergei S Bazylev; Vladimir E Adashev; Aleksei S Shatskikh; Ludmila V Olenina
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Incorporating antagonistic pleiotropy into models for molecular replicators.

Authors:  Tianjiao Qu; Peter Calabrese; Pratik Singhavi; John Tower
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Just like the rest of evolution in Mother Nature, the evolution of cancers may be driven by natural selection, and not by haphazard mutations.

Authors:  Ju Zhang; Xiaomin Lou; Lucas Zellmer; Siqi Liu; Ningzhi Xu; D Joshua Liao
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2014-09-22

Review 6.  Targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Hongchao Tang; Hao Li; Zhijun Sun
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 4.248

7.  Mitotic drive in asymmetric epigenetic inheritance.

Authors:  Rajesh Ranjan; Xin Chen
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.