Literature DB >> 21308463

[Polysegmental Dynesys system].

C Klöckner1, A Beck.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The advantages of using the Dynesys System are claimed to be sufficient and polysegmental dorsal stabilization of the spine while preserving a certain amount of motion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study 20 patients with a polysegmental spinal pathology were treated with polysegmental decompression and using the Dynesys Dynamic Stabilization system. None of the patients had had spinal surgery previously. Bone density was measured in all patients preoperatively.
RESULTS: All 20 patients were followed up for an average of 11.8 months postoperatively. The ability to walk was improved from 581.5 m to 1640.0 m after surgery. Complications observed were one leakage of the dura and one hypertensive crisis. Implant loosening was observed in one female patient, which was revised and dorso-ventral fusion was carried out.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Dynesys Dynamic Stabilization system is a reasonable treatment in patients with polysegmental pathology of the spine. However, the system does not allow restoration of extensive malalignments or deformities of the spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21308463     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-010-1715-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  25 in total

1.  Dynamic neutralisation of the lumbar spine confirmed on a new lumbar spine simulator in vitro.

Authors:  S Freudiger; G Dubois; M Lorrain
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  [Posterior dynamic stabilization as an alternative for dorso-ventral fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative instability].

Authors:  B Cakir; B Ulmar; H Koepp; K Huch; W Puhl; M Richter
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

3.  [Application of a dynamic pedicle screw system (DYNESYS) for lumbar segmental degenerations - comparison of clinical and radiological results for different indications].

Authors:  M Putzier; S V Schneider; J Funk; C Perka
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

4.  Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Charles Carazzo; René Schmidt; Thomas Mattes; Heiko Reichel; Wolfram Käfer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; James Beastall; Justin Hughes; Efthimios J Karadimas; Malcolm Nicol; Francis Smith; Douglas Wardlaw
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Fujiwara; T H Lim; H S An; N Tanaka; C H Jeon; G B Andersson; V M Haughton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The transition zone above a lumbosacral fusion.

Authors:  M F Hambly; L L Wiltse; N Raghavan; G Schneiderman; C Koenig
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Stefan Schaeren; Ivan Broger; Bernhard Jeanneret
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Klaus John Schnake; Stefan Schaeren; Bernard Jeanneret
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The relationship between disc degeneration and flexibility of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  N Tanaka; H S An; T H Lim; A Fujiwara; C H Jeon; V M Haughton
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.