Literature DB >> 19092623

Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years.

Abhishek Kumar1, James Beastall, Justin Hughes, Efthimios J Karadimas, Malcolm Nicol, Francis Smith, Douglas Wardlaw.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective case series.
OBJECTIVE: To study the radiologic changes in the intervertebral disc after Dynesys dynamic stabilization. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Adjacent segment disc degeneration is one of the potential complications of fusion surgery. It has been proposed that nonfusion motion preservation surgery may prevent accelerated adjacent segment degeneration because of the protective effect of persisting segmental motion.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients who underwent Dynesys procedure between November 2002 and June 2004 and have completed 2-year follow-up MRI scans were included in this study. Preoperative and 2 year postoperative lumbar MRI scans were evaluated by 2 independent observers. T2-weighted mid-sagittal images were used and disc degeneration classified according to the Woodend classification of disc degeneration. Anterior and posterior intervertebral disc heights were also measured.
RESULTS: Of the 32 patients, 20 patients underwent Dynesys procedure alone and 12 underwent additional fusion at 1 or more levels. A total of 70 levels were operated on, of which 13 levels were fused.There was a statistically significant increase in the mean Woodend score at the operated levels in the Dynesys alone group, a change from 1.95 before surgery to 2.52 after surgery (P < 0.001). The mean Woodend scores changed from 1.27 preoperative to 1.55 postoperative (P = 0.066) at the proximal adjacent levels, and from 1.37 to 1.62 at the distal levels (P = 0.157). There was good interobserver agreement (weighted kappa score of 0.819). The anterior intervertebral disc height reduced by 2 mm from 9.25 to 7.17 (P < 0.001). The posterior disc height increased by 0.14 mm but this change was not significant.
CONCLUSION: Disc degeneration at the bridged and adjacent segment seems to continue despite Dynesys dynamic stabilization. This continuing degeneration could be due to natural disease progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19092623     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818bdca7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  36 in total

1.  [Pedicle screw-based systems for dynamic stabilization : An insight into the philosophy, technique, indications and success of these systems].

Authors:  J Richolt; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Long-term results of the Dynesys implant].

Authors:  C Klöckner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Dynamic posterior stabilization with the pedicle screw system DYNESYS®].

Authors:  Othmar Schwarzenbach; Ulrich Berlemann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 4.  Clinical and biomechanical researches of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods for semi-rigid lumbar fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chan Li; Lei Liu; Jian-Yong Shi; Kai-Zhong Yan; Wei-Zhong Shen; Zhen-Rong Yang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Qingan Zhu; Eyal Itshayek; Claire F Jones; Timothy Schwab; Chadwick R Larson; Lawrence G Lenke; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Adjacent segment instability after treatment with a Graf ligament at minimum 8 years' followup.

Authors:  Yongsoo Choi; Kisoo Kim; Kwangyoung So
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Elastic resistance of the spine: Why does motion preservation surgery almost fail?

Authors:  Alessandro Landi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

8.  Kinematic evaluation of the adjacent segments after lumbar instrumented surgery: a comparison between rigid fusion and dynamic non-fusion stabilization.

Authors:  Yuichiro Morishita; Hideki Ohta; Masatoshi Naito; Yoshiyuki Matsumoto; George Huang; Masato Tatsumi; Yoshiharu Takemitsu; Hirotaka Kida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Adjacent Segment Pathology after Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Jae Chul Lee; Sung-Woo Choi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

10.  Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion?

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis; Spyros Zacharatos; Andreas Zafiropoulos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.