Literature DB >> 12928999

[Posterior dynamic stabilization as an alternative for dorso-ventral fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative instability].

B Cakir1, B Ulmar, H Koepp, K Huch, W Puhl, M Richter.   

Abstract

AIM: Our retrospective study analyzed the outcome of patients with degenerative lumbar instability with spinal stenosis, who underwent decompression surgery with dorsoventral fusion (Group I) and decompression surgery with posterior dynamic stabilization (Group II).
METHOD: For 10 patients in each group intra- and postoperative data were obtained and the functional outcome was evaluated with the "Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire" (OQ) and the "Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire" (SF-36). The average follow up was 14.4 months in Group I, 15.2 months in Group II.
RESULTS: In Group I the OQ averaged postoperatively 32 points (preoperatively 46 points), the "Physical Component Summary" (PCS) of SF-36 averaged 34 points (preoperatively 24 points), the "Mental Component Summary" (MCS) averaged 43 points (preoperatively 36). In Group II the values at follow up were as follows: OQ 33 points (preoperatively 54), PCS 34 points (preoperatively 28) and MCS 46 points (preoperatively 36). The average hospitalization was 28.4 days in Group I, 19.3 days in Group II and the average operation time was 218 minutes in Group I, 163 minutes in Group II.
CONCLUSION: When compared the functional outcome, the dynamic stabilization seems to be a promising alternative to fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar instability with spinal stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12928999     DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb        ISSN: 0044-3220


  14 in total

1.  [Long-term results of the Dynesys implant].

Authors:  C Klöckner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study.

Authors:  C Schilling; S Krüger; T M Grupp; G N Duda; W Blömer; A Rohlmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Dynesys fixation for lumbar spine degeneration.

Authors:  Matthias Bothmann; Erich Kast; Gerald Jens Boldt; Joachim Oberle
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis: potential impact of dynamic stabilization based on imaging analysis.

Authors:  Thomas W Lawhorne; Federico P Girardi; Curtis A Mina; Iaonnis Pappou; Frank P Cammisa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Mechanical concepts for disc regeneration.

Authors:  Klaus John Schnake; Michael Putzier; Norbert P Haas; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Predictors of improvement in quality of life and pain relief in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age: a study based on the Spine Tango registry.

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Christian Herren; Jan Siewe; Anne F Mannion; Christoph Röder; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  [Polysegmental Dynesys system].

Authors:  C Klöckner; A Beck
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Clinical experience of the dynamic stabilization system for the degenerative spine disease.

Authors:  Soo-Eon Lee; Sung-Bae Park; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Chun-Kee Chung; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2008-05-20

9.  Skipping posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization for distant segment degenerative disease.

Authors:  Bilgehan Solmaz; Ahmet Levent Aydin; Cengiz Gomleksiz; Yaprak Ataker; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-10-03

10.  A short history of posterior dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Cengiz Gomleksiz; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.