Literature DB >> 15106061

[Application of a dynamic pedicle screw system (DYNESYS) for lumbar segmental degenerations - comparison of clinical and radiological results for different indications].

M Putzier1, S V Schneider, J Funk, C Perka.   

Abstract

AIM: Evaluation of the efficacy of a dynamic stabilizing system for different indications using medium-term clinical and radiological parameters.
METHODS: Out of a total of 70 evaluated patients, 35 showed initial disc degeneration and disc herniation (group 1). In this group, additional nucleotomy was performed. Group 2 included 22 patients with initial osteochondrosis and facet joint osteoarthritis. 13 patients suffered from progressive segment degeneration or degenerative spondylolisthesis (group 3). Clinical evaluation was performed preoperatively, three months postoperatively and at follow-up (33 months). Examinations included subjective and objective measures using the Oswestry Index and VAS as well as radiographs and MRI.
RESULTS: Oswestry Index and VAS improved significantly in groups 1 and 2 and remained improved until follow-up. Group 3 showed no significant changes. The evaluation of radiographs and MRI of groups 1 and 2 revealed no progression of the degeneration either at the operated segments or at the adjacent segments. In group 3, 9 cases of progressive degeneration of the operated segments and 3 cases of adjacent segment degeneration were found. Out of 5 implant-associated complications 4 were observed in group 3.
CONCLUSION: Dynesys is able to compensate initial morphological changes and to prevent progression of segment degeneration. The system seems not to be indicated for treating marked deformities or if osseous decompression needs to be performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15106061     DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-818781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb        ISSN: 0044-3220


  15 in total

1.  [Pedicle screw-based systems for dynamic stabilization : An insight into the philosophy, technique, indications and success of these systems].

Authors:  J Richolt; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Long-term results of the Dynesys implant].

Authors:  C Klöckner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study.

Authors:  C Schilling; S Krüger; T M Grupp; G N Duda; W Blömer; A Rohlmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  [Dynamic posterior stabilization with the pedicle screw system DYNESYS®].

Authors:  Othmar Schwarzenbach; Ulrich Berlemann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Nagananda K Burra; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Dynesys fixation for lumbar spine degeneration.

Authors:  Matthias Bothmann; Erich Kast; Gerald Jens Boldt; Joachim Oberle
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis: potential impact of dynamic stabilization based on imaging analysis.

Authors:  Thomas W Lawhorne; Federico P Girardi; Curtis A Mina; Iaonnis Pappou; Frank P Cammisa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Is it possible to preserve lumbar lordosis after hybrid stabilization? Preliminary results of a novel rigid-dynamic stabilization system in degenerative lumbar pathologies.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Luca Cavagnaro; Marco Basso; Andrea Zanirato; Lamberto Felli; Carlo Formica
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Which radiographic parameters are linked to failure of a dynamic spinal implant?

Authors:  Eike Hoff; Patrick Strube; Antonius Rohlmann; Christian Gross; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Christof Hurschler; Marcel Haversath; Ulf Liljenqvist; Viola Bullmann; Timm J Filler; Nani Osada; Eva-Maria Fallenberg; Lars Hackenberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.