Literature DB >> 21305664

Event-related potential activity in the basal ganglia differentiates rewards from nonrewards: temporospatial principal components analysis and source localization of the feedback negativity.

Dan Foti1, Anna Weinberg, Joseph Dien, Greg Hajcak.   

Abstract

Event-related potential studies of reward processing have consistently identified the feedback negativity (FN), an early neural response that differentiates feedback indicating unfavorable versus favorable outcomes. Several important questions remain, however, about the nature of this response. In this study, the FN was recorded in response to monetary gains and losses during a laboratory gambling task, and temporospatial principal components analysis was used to separate the FN from overlapping responses. The FN was identified as a positive deflection at frontocentral recording sites that was enhanced for rewards compared with nonrewards. Furthermore, source localization techniques identified the striatum as a likely neural generator. These data indicate that this apparent FN reflects increased striatal activation in response to favorable outcomes that is reduced or absent for unfavorable outcomes, thereby providing unique information about the timing and nature of basal ganglia activity related to reward processing.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21305664      PMCID: PMC6870417          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  50 in total

1.  FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task.

Authors:  B Knutson; A Westdorp; E Kaiser; D Hommer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Sander Nieuwenhuis; Nick Yeung; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Jeff T Larsen; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Contributions of principal neocortical neurons to magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography signals.

Authors:  Shingo Murakami; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Greg Hajcak; Jeff T Larsen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  The feedback correct-related positivity: sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Kaivon L Pakzad-Vaezi; Olave E Krigolson
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  P3 waves to the discrimination of targets in homogeneous and heterogeneous stimulus sequences.

Authors:  E Courchesne; S A Hillyard; R Y Courchesne
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Dopamine-dependent prediction errors underpin reward-seeking behaviour in humans.

Authors:  Mathias Pessiglione; Ben Seymour; Guillaume Flandin; Raymond J Dolan; Chris D Frith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Activity in human reward-sensitive brain areas is strongly context dependent.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Dirk J Heslenfeld; Niels J Alting von Geusau; Rogier B Mars; Clay B Holroyd; Nick Yeung
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  State sadness reduces neural sensitivity to nonrewards versus rewards.

Authors:  Dan Foti; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  132 in total

1.  Neural reactivity to monetary rewards and losses differentiates social from generalized anxiety in children.

Authors:  Ellen M Kessel; Autumn Kujawa; Greg Hajcak Proudfit; Daniel N Klein
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 2.  Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Brain signatures of perceiving a smile: Time course and source localization.

Authors:  David Beltrán; Manuel G Calvo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Social processing in early adolescence: Associations between neurophysiological, self-report, and behavioral measures.

Authors:  Autumn Kujawa; Ellen M Kessel; Ashley Carroll; Kodi B Arfer; Daniel N Klein
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Executive control- and reward-related neural processes associated with the opportunity to engage in voluntary dishonest moral decision making.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Hu; Narun Pornpattananangkul; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Beyond valence and magnitude: a flexible evaluative coding system in the brain.

Authors:  Ruolei Gu; Zhihui Lei; Lucas Broster; Tingting Wu; Yang Jiang; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Expectancy effects in feedback processing are explained primarily by time-frequency delta not theta.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Time-Frequency Reward-Related Delta Prospectively Predicts the Development of Adolescent-Onset Depression.

Authors:  Brady D Nelson; Zachary P Infantolino; Daniel N Klein; Greg Perlman; Roman Kotov; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-08-07

9.  Effects of reward context on feedback processing as indexed by time-frequency analysis.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  The feedback negativity reflects favorable compared to nonfavorable outcomes based on global, not local, alternatives.

Authors:  Autumn Kujawa; Ezra Smith; Christian Luhmann; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.