Literature DB >> 15945130

Activity in human reward-sensitive brain areas is strongly context dependent.

Sander Nieuwenhuis1, Dirk J Heslenfeld, Niels J Alting von Geusau, Rogier B Mars, Clay B Holroyd, Nick Yeung.   

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging research in humans has identified a number of brain areas that are activated by the delivery of primary and secondary reinforcers. The present study investigated how activity in these reward-sensitive regions is modulated by the context in which rewards and punishments are experienced. Fourteen healthy volunteers were scanned during the performance of a simple monetary gambling task that involved a "win" condition (in which the possible outcomes were a large monetary gain, a small gain, or no gain of money) and a "lose" condition (in which the possible outcomes were a large monetary loss, a small loss, or no loss of money). We observed reward-sensitive activity in a number of brain areas previously implicated in reward processing, including the striatum, prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate, and inferior parietal lobule. Critically, activity in these reward-sensitive areas was highly sensitive to the range of possible outcomes from which an outcome was selected. In particular, these regions were activated to a comparable degree by the best outcomes in each condition-a large gain in the win condition and no loss of money in the lose condition-despite the large difference in the objective value of these outcomes. In addition, some reward-sensitive brain areas showed a binary instead of graded sensitivity to the magnitude of the outcomes from each distribution. These results provide important evidence regarding the way in which the brain scales the motivational value of events by the context in which these events occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15945130     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  107 in total

1.  Adaptive coding of reward prediction errors is gated by striatal coupling.

Authors:  Soyoung Q Park; Thorsten Kahnt; Deborah Talmi; Jörg Rieskamp; Raymond J Dolan; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Mesolimbic recruitment by nondrug rewards in detoxified alcoholics: effort anticipation, reward anticipation, and reward delivery.

Authors:  James M Bjork; Ashley R Smith; Gang Chen; Daniel W Hommer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Xun Liu; Jacqueline Hairston; Madeleine Schrier; Jin Fan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Altered impulse control in alcohol dependence: neural measures of stop signal performance.

Authors:  Chiang-Shan Ray Li; Xi Luo; Peisi Yan; Keri Bergquist; Rajita Sinha
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Reward processing deficits and impulsivity in high-risk offspring of alcoholics: A study of event-related potentials during a monetary gambling task.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Ashwini K Pandey; David B Chorlian; Niklas Manz; Arthur T Stimus; Lance O Bauer; Victor M Hesselbrock; Marc A Schuckit; Samuel Kuperman; John Kramer; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Effects of reward context on feedback processing as indexed by time-frequency analysis.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Differential encoding of losses and gains in the human striatum.

Authors:  Ben Seymour; Nathaniel Daw; Peter Dayan; Tania Singer; Ray Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Striatal outcome processing in healthy aging.

Authors:  Karin M Cox; Howard J Aizenstein; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Understanding overbidding: using the neural circuitry of reward to design economic auctions.

Authors:  Mauricio R Delgado; Andrew Schotter; Erkut Y Ozbay; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.