Literature DB >> 18513364

The feedback correct-related positivity: sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback.

Clay B Holroyd1, Kaivon L Pakzad-Vaezi, Olave E Krigolson.   

Abstract

The N200 and the feedback error-related negativity (fERN) are two components of the event-related brain potential (ERP) that share similar scalp distributions, time courses, morphologies, and functional dependencies, which raises the question as to whether they are actually the same phenomenon. To investigate this issue, we recorded the ERP from participants engaged in two tasks that independently elicited the N200 and fERN. Our results indicate that they are, in fact, the same ERP component and further suggest that positive feedback elicits a positive-going deflection in the time range of the fERN. Taken together, these results indicate that negative feedback elicits a common N200 and that modulation of fERN amplitude results from the superposition on correct trials of a positive-going deflection that we term the feedback correct-related positivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18513364     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00668.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  158 in total

1.  Brain oscillatory activity associated with task switching and feedback processing.

Authors:  Toni Cunillera; Lluís Fuentemilla; Jose Periañez; Josep Marco-Pallarès; Ulrike M Krämer; Estela Càmara; Thomas F Münte; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Frontal theta reflects uncertainty and unexpectedness during exploration and exploitation.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Christina M Figueroa; Michael X Cohen; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Worse than feared? Failure induction modulates the electrophysiological signature of error monitoring during subsequent learning.

Authors:  Kerstin Unger; Jutta Kray; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Social status determines how we monitor and evaluate our performance.

Authors:  Maarten A S Boksem; Evelien Kostermans; Branka Milivojevic; David De Cremer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Modulation of the feedback-related negativity by instruction and experience.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Expectancy effects in feedback processing are explained primarily by time-frequency delta not theta.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Time-Frequency Reward-Related Delta Prospectively Predicts the Development of Adolescent-Onset Depression.

Authors:  Brady D Nelson; Zachary P Infantolino; Daniel N Klein; Greg Perlman; Roman Kotov; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-08-07

9.  Effects of reward context on feedback processing as indexed by time-frequency analysis.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Frontal theta links prediction errors to behavioral adaptation in reinforcement learning.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Michael J Frank; Theresa J Klein; John J B Allen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.