Literature DB >> 28865935

Expectancy effects in feedback processing are explained primarily by time-frequency delta not theta.

Adreanna T M Watts1, Matthew D Bachman2, Edward M Bernat3.   

Abstract

The roles of outcome valence and expectancy in feedback processing have been investigated as important factors modulating event-related potential (ERP) measures including the feedback negativity (FN) and P300, but results have been inconsistent. Recent work from our group has shown that processes underlying the FN and P300 are better represented as separable processes in the theta (3-7Hz) and delta (0-3Hz) ranges using time-frequency analysis. The current study evaluated the modulation of time-domain FN and P300 and time-frequency theta and delta to outcome valence and expectancy in a gambling feedback task paradigm. Results revealed that the FN was sensitive to valence but not expectancy, and that valence effects were driven by loss-sensitive theta and gain-sensitive delta. Alternatively, the P300 was sensitive to the expectedness of outcomes but only for gain trials, and these expectancy differences were explained by time-frequency delta not theta. These results add to a growing body of research showing that time-frequency measures reflect separable processes underlying time-domain components, where theta is more sensitive to primary task features and less sensitive to secondary features while delta is sensitive to primary and more complex, secondary task features.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delta; ERP; Event-related potential; Expectancy; FN; Feedback processing; Gambling; P300; Theta; Time-frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28865935      PMCID: PMC6157594          DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.08.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  63 in total

1.  Multiple time-frequency components account for the complex functional reactivity of P300.

Authors:  J Yordanova; M Devrim; V Kolev; A Ademoglu; T Demiralp
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes.

Authors:  E Başar; C Başar-Eroglu; S Karakaş; M Schürmann
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  To do or not to do? Action enlarges the FRN and P300 effects in outcome evaluation.

Authors:  Zhiheng Zhou; Rongjun Yu; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Decomposing delta, theta, and alpha time-frequency ERP activity from a visual oddball task using PCA.

Authors:  Edward M Bernat; Stephen M Malone; William J Williams; Christopher J Patrick; William G Iacono
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

6.  Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection.

Authors:  W H Miltner; C H Braun; M G Coles
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  P3 waves to the discrimination of targets in homogeneous and heterogeneous stimulus sequences.

Authors:  E Courchesne; S A Hillyard; R Y Courchesne
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP.

Authors:  H V Semlitsch; P Anderer; P Schuster; O Presslich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise?

Authors:  E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  The reward positivity: from basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression.

Authors:  Greg Hajcak Proudfit
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  7 in total

1.  Independent contributions of theta and delta time-frequency activity to the visual oddball P3b.

Authors:  Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Effects of reward context on feedback processing as indexed by time-frequency analysis.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Sequential gains and losses during gambling feedback: Differential effects in time-frequency delta and theta measures.

Authors:  Matthew D Bachman; Adreanna T M Watts; Paul Collins; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.348

4.  Event-Related Potentials in Relation to Risk-Taking: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dilushi Chandrakumar; Daniel Feuerriegel; Stefan Bode; Megan Grech; Hannah A D Keage
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Internal cost of spontaneous deception revealed by ERPs and EEG spectral perturbations.

Authors:  Chengkang Zhu; Jingjing Pan; Shuaiqi Li; Xiaoli Liu; Pengcheng Wang; Jianbiao Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Electrophysiological correlates of feedback processing in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.

Authors:  Alba Gomez-Andres; Anna Suades; David Cucurell; Maria Angels de Miquel; Montserrat Juncadella; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  P2 Manifests Subjective Evaluation of Reward Processing Under Social Comparison.

Authors:  Feng Zou; Xiaoya Li; Fenfang Chen; Yao Wang; Li Wang; Yufeng Wang; Xin Wu; Meng Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.