Literature DB >> 25957164

Validation of a nurses' views on electronic medical record systems (EMR) questionnaire in Turkish health system.

Mehmet Top1, Ali Yilmaz, Erdem Karabulut, Ochieng George Otieno, Melahat Saylam, Sevgi Bakır, Sümbül Top.   

Abstract

Using of EMR in health services and organizations is steadily increasing for quality improvement, cost effectiveness and performance development. However, no validated national and international instruments (scale, questionnaire, index, and inventory) have assessed the effectiveness, satisfaction, health care savings, patient safety and cost minimization of electronic medical and health systems from the viewpoint and perceptions of nurses in Turkish health services. The perceptions of health care professionals especially physicians and nurses can contribute important information that may predict their acceptance of EMR and desired mode of use for EMR, evaluation performance of EMR thus guiding EMR implementation in hospitals. This article is a report of validation of the instrument to measure nurses' views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with EMR in Turkish health system. Items in the questionnaire were designed and obtained following O.G. Otieno, H. Toyama, M. Asonuma, M. Kanai-Pak, K. Naitoh's questionnaire about Use, Quality and User Satisfaction with EMR systems. Reliability and validity were examined and investigated in terms of responses from 487 nurses from one education hospital in Ankara, Turkey. This study was planned and conducted at a university hospital. The validation process was based on construct validity in this study. The response rate was 74.92%. Cronbach's alphas of three factors (use, quality and satisfaction of EMR) ranged from 0.78 to 0.94. Goodness-of-fit indices from the confirmatory factor analysis showed a reasonable model fit. Results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2 statistic indicated significant result (p < 0.001) and model fit was acceptable according to relative χ2 statistic (χ2/df = 2.8 < 5). Further validation of the instrument could yield positive results in health systems in the different countries. Also further validation and reliability studies could be planned on physicians and other health professionals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25957164     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-015-0250-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  28 in total

1.  Immediate benefits realized following implementation of physician order entry at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Hagop S Mekhjian; Rajee R Kumar; Lynn Kuehn; Thomas D Bentley; Phyllis Teater; Andrew Thomas; Beth Payne; Asif Ahmad
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Using electronic medical record systems for admission decisions in emergency departments: examining the crowdedness effect.

Authors:  Ofir Ben-Assuli; Moshe Leshno; Itamar Shabtai
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Validation of a professionals' satisfaction questionnaire with electronic medical records (PSQ-EMR) in psychiatry.

Authors:  L Boyer; K Baumstarck-Barrau; R Belzeaux; J M Azorin; J M Chabannes; D Dassa; C Lancon; J Naudin; F Poinso; M Rufo; J C Samuelian; A Loundou; M Fieschi; P Auquier
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 5.361

4.  Variation in implementation and use of computerized clinical reminders in an integrated healthcare system.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Juliet N Woods; Steven M Asch; Peter Glassman; Bradley N Doebbeling
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.

Authors:  Antonios Likourezos; Donald B Chalfin; Daniel G Murphy; Barbara Sommer; Kelly Darcy; Steven J Davidson
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Electronic medical records for a rural family practice: a case study in systems development.

Authors:  Liam O'Neill; William Klepack
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 7.  Nursing information management and processing: a framework and definition for systems analysis, design and evaluation.

Authors:  W T Goossen
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1996-01

8.  Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  H Laerum; G Ellingsen; A Faxvaag
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-12-08

9.  A study on agent-based secure scheme for electronic medical record system.

Authors:  Tzer-Long Chen; Yu-Fang Chung; Frank Y S Lin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Medical information systems: a foundation for healthcare technologies in developing countries.

Authors:  Gari D Clifford; Joaquin A Blaya; Rachel Hall-Clifford; Hamish Sf Fraser
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation Study for an ISO 13606 Archetype Based Medical Data Visualization Method.

Authors:  Georgy Kopanitsa
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  The role of medical data in efficient patient care delivery: a review.

Authors:  Kasaw Adane; Mucheye Gizachew; Semalegne Kendie
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2019-04-24

3.  Determining the Hospital Information System (HIS) Success Rate: Development of a New Instrument and Case Study.

Authors:  Zahra Ebnehoseini; Hamed Tabesh; Kolsoum Deldar; Sayyed Mostafa Mostafavi; Mahmood Tara
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.