Literature DB >> 21291174

A machine learning-based method to improve docking scoring functions and its application to drug repurposing.

Sarah L Kinnings1, Nina Liu, Peter J Tonge, Richard M Jackson, Lei Xie, Philip E Bourne.   

Abstract

Docking scoring functions are notoriously weak predictors of binding affinity. They typically assign a common set of weights to the individual energy terms that contribute to the overall energy score; however, these weights should be gene family dependent. In addition, they incorrectly assume that individual interactions contribute toward the total binding affinity in an additive manner. In reality, noncovalent interactions often depend on one another in a nonlinear manner. In this paper, we show how the use of support vector machines (SVMs), trained by associating sets of individual energy terms retrieved from molecular docking with the known binding affinity of each compound from high-throughput screening experiments, can be used to improve the correlation between known binding affinities and those predicted by the docking program eHiTS. We construct two prediction models: a regression model trained using IC(50) values from BindingDB, and a classification model trained using active and decoy compounds from the Directory of Useful Decoys (DUD). Moreover, to address the issue of overrepresentation of negative data in high-throughput screening data sets, we have designed a multiple-planar SVM training procedure for the classification model. The increased performance that both SVMs give when compared with the original eHiTS scoring function highlights the potential for using nonlinear methods when deriving overall energy scores from their individual components. We apply the above methodology to train a new scoring function for direct inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) InhA. By combining ligand binding site comparison with the new scoring function, we propose that phosphodiesterase inhibitors can potentially be repurposed to target M.tb InhA. Our methodology may be applied to other gene families for which target structures and activity data are available, as demonstrated in the work presented here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21291174      PMCID: PMC3076728          DOI: 10.1021/ci100369f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  50 in total

1.  ZINC--a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening.

Authors:  John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy from computer simulations.

Authors:  Hyung-June Woo; Benoît Roux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Absolute binding free energy calculations using molecular dynamics simulations with restraining potentials.

Authors:  Jiyao Wang; Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  eHiTS: a new fast, exhaustive flexible ligand docking system.

Authors:  Zsolt Zsoldos; Darryl Reid; Aniko Simon; Sayyed Bashir Sadjad; A Peter Johnson
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 2.518

5.  Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Brian K Shoichet; John J Irwin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Parameter estimation for scoring protein-ligand interactions using negative training data.

Authors:  Tuan A Pham; Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.

Authors:  Gregory L Warren; C Webster Andrews; Anna-Maria Capelli; Brian Clarke; Judith LaLonde; Millard H Lambert; Mika Lindvall; Neysa Nevins; Simon F Semus; Stefan Senger; Giovanna Tedesco; Ian D Wall; James M Woolven; Catherine E Peishoff; Martha S Head
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Pyrrolidine carboxamides as a novel class of inhibitors of enoyl acyl carrier protein reductase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Xin He; Akram Alian; Robert Stroud; Paul R Ortiz de Montellano
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  BindingDB: a web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Tiqing Liu; Yuhmei Lin; Xin Wen; Robert N Jorissen; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A robust and efficient algorithm for the shape description of protein structures and its application in predicting ligand binding sites.

Authors:  Lei Xie; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  52 in total

1.  Improving molecular docking through eHiTS' tunable scoring function.

Authors:  Orr Ravitz; Zsolt Zsoldos; Aniko Simon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  FDA approved drugs complexed to their targets: evaluating pose prediction accuracy of docking protocols.

Authors:  Mohammed H Bohari; G Narahari Sastry
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Experimental versus predicted affinities for ligand binding to estrogen receptor: iterative selection and rescoring of docked poses systematically improves the correlation.

Authors:  James S Wright; James M Anderson; Hooman Shadnia; Tony Durst; John A Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  A virtual screen discovers novel, fragment-sized inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis InhA.

Authors:  Alexander L Perryman; Weixuan Yu; Xin Wang; Sean Ekins; Stefano Forli; Shao-Gang Li; Joel S Freundlich; Peter J Tonge; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Delineation of Polypharmacology across the Human Structural Kinome Using a Functional Site Interaction Fingerprint Approach.

Authors:  Zheng Zhao; Li Xie; Lei Xie; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Convex-PL: a novel knowledge-based potential for protein-ligand interactions deduced from structural databases using convex optimization.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Exploring fragment-based target-specific ranking protocol with machine learning on cathepsin S.

Authors:  Yuwei Yang; Jianing Lu; Chao Yang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  TopologyNet: Topology based deep convolutional and multi-task neural networks for biomolecular property predictions.

Authors:  Zixuan Cang; Guo-Wei Wei
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Drug-target interaction prediction by integrating chemical, genomic, functional and pharmacological data.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Jinbo Xu; Jianyang Zeng
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2014

Review 10.  Application of Computational Biology and Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Cancer Precision Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Nagasundaram Nagarajan; Edward K Y Yapp; Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le; Balu Kamaraj; Abeer Mohammed Al-Subaie; Hui-Yuan Yeh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.