Literature DB >> 17004701

Parameter estimation for scoring protein-ligand interactions using negative training data.

Tuan A Pham1, Ajay N Jain.   

Abstract

Surflex-Dock employs an empirically derived scoring function to rank putative protein-ligand interactions by flexible docking of small molecules to proteins of known structure. The scoring function employed by Surflex was developed purely on the basis of positive data, comprising noncovalent protein-ligand complexes with known binding affinities. Consequently, scoring function terms for improper interactions received little weight in parameter estimation, and an ad hoc scheme for avoiding protein-ligand interpenetration was adopted. We present a generalized method for incorporating synthetically generated negative training data, which allows for rigorous estimation of all scoring function parameters. Geometric docking accuracy remained excellent under the new parametrization. In addition, a test of screening utility covering a diverse set of 29 proteins and corresponding ligand sets showed improved performance. Maximal enrichment of true ligands over nonligands exceeded 20-fold in over 80% of cases, with enrichment of greater than 100-fold in over 50% of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17004701     DOI: 10.1021/jm050040j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  54 in total

1.  QMOD: physically meaningful QSAR.

Authors:  Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Brian K Shoichet; John J Irwin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 3.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go.

Authors:  N Moitessier; P Englebienne; D Lee; J Lawandi; C R Corbeil
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Comparative performance of several flexible docking programs and scoring functions: enrichment studies for a diverse set of pharmaceutically relevant targets.

Authors:  Zhiyong Zhou; Anthony K Felts; Richard A Friesner; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Customizing scoring functions for docking.

Authors:  Tuan A Pham; Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Ermias Lemma Tilahun; Terry-Elinor Reid; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.608

7.  Structural conservation in band 4.1, ezrin, radixin, moesin (FERM) domains as a guide to identify inhibitors of the proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2.

Authors:  Nathalie Meurice; Lei Wang; Christopher A Lipinski; Zhongbo Yang; Christopher Hulme; Joseph C Loftus
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Total synthesis and evaluation of C26-hydroxyepothilone D derivatives for photoaffinity labeling of beta-tubulin.

Authors:  Emily A Reiff; Sajiv K Nair; John T Henri; Jack F Greiner; Bollu S Reddy; Ramappa Chakrasali; Sunil A David; Ting-Lan Chiu; Elizabeth A Amin; Richard H Himes; David G Vander Velde; Gunda I Georg
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.354

9.  Scoring ensembles of docked protein:ligand interactions for virtual lead optimization.

Authors:  Janet L Paulsen; Amy C Anderson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  FINDSITE(comb): a threading/structure-based, proteomic-scale virtual ligand screening approach.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.