Literature DB >> 31729618

Exploring fragment-based target-specific ranking protocol with machine learning on cathepsin S.

Yuwei Yang1, Jianing Lu1, Chao Yang1, Yingkai Zhang2,3.   

Abstract

Cathepsin S (CatS), a member of cysteine cathepsin proteases, has been well studied due to its significant role in many pathological processes, including arthritis, cancer and cardiovascular diseases. CatS inhibitors have been included in D3R-GC3 for both docking pose prediction and affinity ranking, and in D3R-GC4 for binding affinity ranking. The difficulties posed by CatS inhibitors in D3R mainly come from three aspects: large size, high flexibility and similar chemical structures. We have participated in GC4; our best submitted model, which employs a similarity-based alignment docking and Vina scoring protocol, yielded Kendall's τ of 0.23 for 459 binders in GC4. In our further explorations with machine learning, by curating a CatS specific training set, adopting a similarity-based constrained docking method as well as an arm-based fragmentation strategy which can describe large inhibitors in a locality-sensitive fashion, our best structure-based ranking protocol can achieve Kendall's τ of 0.52 for all binders in GC4. In this exploration process, we have demonstrated the importance of training data, docking approaches and fragmentation strategies in inhibitor-ranking protocol development with machine learning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Docking; Fragmentation; Machine learning; Scoring function; Virtual screening

Year:  2019        PMID: 31729618      PMCID: PMC6921089          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-019-00247-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  52 in total

1.  A comparative assessment of ranking accuracies of conventional and machine-learning-based scoring functions for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Hossam M Ashtawy; Nihar R Mahapatra
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Extended-connectivity fingerprints.

Authors:  David Rogers; Mathew Hahn
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 3.  Cathepsin S: therapeutic, diagnostic, and prognostic potential.

Authors:  Richard D A Wilkinson; Rich Williams; Christopher J Scott; Roberta E Burden
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.915

4.  Monte Carlo on the manifold and MD refinement for binding pose prediction of protein-ligand complexes: 2017 D3R Grand Challenge.

Authors:  Mikhail Ignatov; Cong Liu; Andrey Alekseenko; Zhuyezi Sun; Dzmitry Padhorny; Sergei Kotelnikov; Andrey Kazennov; Ivan Grebenkin; Yaroslav Kholodov; Istvan Kolosvari; Alberto Perez; Ken Dill; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Target-specific support vector machine scoring in structure-based virtual screening: computational validation, in vitro testing in kinases, and effects on lung cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Liwei Li; May Khanna; Inha Jo; Fang Wang; Nicole M Ashpole; Andy Hudmon; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.

Authors:  Symon Gathiaka; Shuai Liu; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Jeanne A Stuckey; You Na Kang; Jim Delproposto; Ginger Kubish; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson; Stephen K Burley; W Patrick Walters; Rommie E Amaro; Victoria A Feher; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Pyrazole-based cathepsin S inhibitors with arylalkynes as P1 binding elements.

Authors:  Michael K Ameriks; Frank U Axe; Scott D Bembenek; James P Edwards; Yin Gu; Lars Karlsson; Mike Randal; Siquan Sun; Robin L Thurmond; Jian Zhu
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 8.  Cysteine cathepsins: from structure, function and regulation to new frontiers.

Authors:  Vito Turk; Veronika Stoka; Olga Vasiljeva; Miha Renko; Tao Sun; Boris Turk; Dušan Turk
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-10-12

9.  A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking.

Authors:  Pedro J Ballester; John B O Mitchell
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  AlphaSpace: Fragment-Centric Topographical Mapping To Target Protein-Protein Interaction Interfaces.

Authors:  David Rooklin; Cheng Wang; Joseph Katigbak; Paramjit S Arora; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  5 in total

1.  Lin_F9: A Linear Empirical Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Docking.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 6.162

Review 2.  Delta Machine Learning to Improve Scoring-Ranking-Screening Performances of Protein-Ligand Scoring Functions.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.162

3.  Recent trends in artificial intelligence-driven identification and development of anti-neurodegenerative therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Kushagra Kashyap; Mohammad Imran Siddiqi
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.364

4.  Benchmarking ensemble docking methods in D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Jessie Low Gan; Dhruv Kumar; Cynthia Chen; Bryn C Taylor; Benjamin R Jagger; Rommie E Amaro; Christopher T Lee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Protein-Ligand Docking in the Machine-Learning Era.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Eric Anthony Chen; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.927

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.