Literature DB >> 21282999

Central corneal thickness measurements with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography versus ultrasonic pachymetry and rotating Scheimpflug camera.

Akihiro Ishibazawa1, Sho Igarashi, Kazuomi Hanada, Taiji Nagaoka, Satoshi Ishiko, Haruna Ito, Akitoshi Yoshida.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy and repeatability of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) with ultrasonic pachymetry (USP) and a rotating Scheimpflug camera for measuring the central corneal thickness (CCT).
METHODS: The CCT was measured in 30 subjects (30 normal corneas) by the same examiner using RTVue-100 FD-OCT with an anterior segment adaptor, Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera, and SP-2000 USP. Two examiners obtained one FD-OCT measurement from 10 eyes of 5 subjects to assess interexaminer reproducibility.
RESULTS: The mean CCT (±SD) measured by FD-OCT, USP, and the Pentacam were 530 ± 33, 544 ± 34, and 552 ± 35 μm, respectively. Significant correlations were found between FD-OCT and USP (r = 0.97; P < 0.0001), FD-OCT and Pentacam (r = 0.97; P < 0.0001), and USP and Pentacam (r = 0.96; P < 0.0001). Pairwise comparisons showed that the FD-OCT CCT measurement was significantly thinner than those of the other 2 methods (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Regarding intraexaminer repeatability, the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.97 and 0.98. There was high repeatability of the CCT measurements with all methods. FD-OCT also had high interexaminer reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98).
CONCLUSIONS: RTVue-100 FD-OCT may be a useful alternative for measuring the CCT; however, it significantly underestimates the CCT compared with the USP and the Pentacam with slight differences. Although highly correlated, the measurements are not directly interchangeable in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21282999     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181d00800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  34 in total

1.  Comparison of ultrasonic pachymetry and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography for measurement of corneal thickness in dogs with and without corneal disease.

Authors:  A L Hoehn; S M Thomasy; P H Kass; T Horikawa; M Samuel; O R Shull; K A Stewart; C J Murphy
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.688

2.  Comparison of anterior segment measurements using rotating Scheimpflug imaging and partial coherence interferometry.

Authors:  Mohammad Soleimani; Hassan Hashemi; Shiva Mehravaran; Mehdi Khabazkhoob; Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Mohammad Shariati; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Meta-analysis of Pentacam vs. ultrasound pachymetry in central corneal thickness measurement in normal, post-LASIK or PRK, and keratoconic or keratoconus-suspect eyes.

Authors:  Wenjing Wu; Yan Wang; Lulu Xu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Reliability of manual measurements of corneal thickness obtained from healthy canine eyes using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).

Authors:  Anthony F Alario; Christopher G Pirie
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  Repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness measurement with non-contact methods: a comparative study.

Authors:  Tarannum Mansoori; Nagalla Balakrishna
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Effects of 5% sodium chloride ophthalmic ointment on thickness and morphology of the normal canine cornea.

Authors:  Michelle Samuel; Sara M Thomasy; Allison S Calderon; Philip H Kass; Keith Collins; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 1.644

7.  Population-based meta-analysis in Caucasians confirms association with COL5A1 and ZNF469 but not COL8A2 with central corneal thickness.

Authors:  René Hoehn; Tanja Zeller; Virginie J M Verhoeven; Franz Grus; Max Adler; Roger C Wolfs; André G Uitterlinden; Raphaële Castagne; Arne Schillert; Caroline C W Klaver; Norbert Pfeiffer; Alireza Mirshahi
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter.

Authors:  Hasan Ali Bayhan; Seray Aslan Bayhan; Izzet Can
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Comparison of Scheimpflug and swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconus eyes.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Ghoreishi; Seyed Ali Akbar Mortazavi; Zahra-Alsadat Abtahi; Mohammad-Ali Abtahi; Seyed Ali Sonbolestan; Seyed-Hossein Abtahi; Mohadeseh Mohammadinia; Kimia Nekouie Isfahani
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  In vivo evaluation of the cornea and conjunctiva of the normal laboratory beagle using time- and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Ann R Strom; Dennis E Cortés; Carol A Rasmussen; Sara M Thomasy; Kim McIntyre; Shwu-Fei Lee; Philip H Kass; Mark J Mannis; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 1.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.