Literature DB >> 21279121

Electronic fetal monitoring in a small hospital. Part 2: intrapartum use.

R I Casson.   

Abstract

A case series analysis assessed the intrapartum use of an electronic fetal heart rate monitor at a 40-bed hospital in Newfoundland. Seventy-five patients at risk and 52 patients at no predictable risk were monitored during labor. Fetal distress was the sole reason for cesarean section or instrumental delivery in nine of the group at risk and six of the group at no predictable risk. Of these 15 babies, all had five minute Apgar scores greater than six. Intrapartum monitoring is indicated for patients at risk, either because they develop a problem at a time when transfer to a regional centre is precluded, or because they have been judged safe to deliver at the small hospital.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 21279121      PMCID: PMC2154338     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  13 in total

1.  Clinical application of high-risk scoring on an obstetric service.

Authors:  R J Sokol; M G Rosen; J Stojkov; L Chik
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The fetal monitoring debate.

Authors:  J C Hobbins; R Freeman; J T Queenan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  A D Haverkamp; H E Thompson; J G McFee; C Cetrulo
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-06-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Prenatal and intrapartum high-risk screening. I. Prediction of the high-rish neonate.

Authors:  C J Hobel; M A Hyvarinen; D M Okada; W Oh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-09-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  The prediction of intrapartum fetal metabolic acidosis by fetal heart rate monitoring.

Authors:  J A Low; M J Cox; E J Karchmar; M J McGrath; S R Pancham; W N Piercy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  A controlled trial of fetal heart rate monitoring in a low-risk obstetric population.

Authors:  C Wood; P Renou; J Oats; E Farrell; N Beischer; I Anderson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The case of electronic fetal monitoring.

Authors:  J F Huddleston; H W Perlis; B A Harris
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 0.142

8.  Predictors of intrapartum fetal distress: the role of electronic fetal monitoring. Report of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Consensus Development Task Force.

Authors:  F P Zuspan; E J Quilligan; J D Iams; H P van Geijn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-10-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring.

Authors:  A D Haverkamp; M Orleans; S Langendoerfer; J McFee; J Murphy; H E Thompson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-06-15       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor. A randomized trial.

Authors:  I M Kelso; R J Parsons; G F Lawrence; S S Arora; D K Edmonds; I D Cooke
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.