Literature DB >> 5895

The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.

A D Haverkamp, H E Thompson, J G McFee, C Cetrulo.   

Abstract

Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring of the high-risk obstetric patient is thought to improve the perinatal outcome. A prospective randomized study of 483 high-risk obstetric patients in labor was carried out comparing the effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring with auscultation of fetal heart tones. The infant outcome was measured by neonatal death, Apgar scores, cord blood gases, and neonatal nursery morbidity. There were no differences in the infant outcomes in any measured category between the electronically monitored group and the auscultated group. The cesarean section rate was markedly increased in the monitored group (16.5 vs. 6.8 per cent in the auscultated patients). The presumptive benefits of electronic fetal monitoring for improving fetal outcome were not found in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 5895     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90565-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  31 in total

Review 1.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Declan Devane; Gillian Ml Gyte; Anna Cuthbert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-03

2.  Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: retrospective reflections on a twentieth-century technology.

Authors:  R G Kennedy
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Electronic fetal monitoring in a small hospital. Part 2: intrapartum use.

Authors:  R I Casson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  The electronic fetal monitor: should every mother have one?

Authors:  A S Dixon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Changing ideas in intrapartum care.

Authors:  T Dixon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Periodic health examination, 1989 update: 4. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring and prevention of neonatal herpes simplex. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Fetal monitoring in labour.

Authors:  P W Howie
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-02-15

Review 8.  Cesarean section, 1988--to have or have not!

Authors:  E J Quilligan
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-12

9.  S1-Guideline on the Use of CTG During Pregnancy and Labor: Long version - AWMF Registry No. 015/036.

Authors: 
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.915

10.  Electronic fetal monitoring: a Canadian survey.

Authors:  B L Davies; P A Niday; C A Nimrod; E R Drake; A E Sprague; M J Trépanier
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.