Literature DB >> 36587

The fetal monitoring debate.

J C Hobbins, R Freeman, J T Queenan.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1979        PMID： 36587     DOI： 10.1097/00006250-197907000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN： 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Electronic fetal monitoring in a small hospital. Part 2: intrapartum use.

Authors:  R I Casson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The electronic fetal monitor: should every mother have one?

Authors:  A S Dixon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Association of electronic fetal monitoring during labor with cesarean section rate and with neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  J McCusker; D R Harris; D W Hosmer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Cesarean section: trends and morbidity.

Authors:  T F Baskett; R M McMillen
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Trends in cesarean section rates for the United States, 1970--78.

Authors:  P J Placek; S M Taffel
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Electronic fetal monitoring in relation to cesarean section delivery, for live births and stillbirths in the U.S., 1980.

Authors:  P J Placek; K G Keppel; S M Taffel; T L Liss
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Changing rates and indications for cesarean sections at a community hospital from 1972 to 1979.

Authors:  N N Sehgal
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1981
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.