Literature DB >> 879223

Clinical application of high-risk scoring on an obstetric service.

R J Sokol, M G Rosen, J Stojkov, L Chik.   

Abstract

Obstetric risk scoring is a formalized way of recognizing, documenting, and cumulating antepartum and intrapartum factors to predict later complications for mother, fetus, and infant. If simple, practical, and reliable, risk scoring can be clinically useful in determining appropriate levels of care. In this prospective study, antepartum and intrapartum risk scales were integrated into the clinical record, and the relationship of risk scores to outcome was evaluated for 1,275 consecutively delivered gravid women. The forms could be simply and quickly filled out by the staff. Increased risk on both scales was significantly related to lowered one- and five-minute Apgar scores. The perinatal mortality rate increased from 0 to 93.4 per thousand from the lowest to the highest risk group. More than 80% of all perinatal deaths occurred in the one quarter of patients in the highest risk group. These results suggest that this risk scoring system can be used effectively in a clinical setting to identify patients at increased risk for neonatal depression and perinatal death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 879223     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90212-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  16 in total

1.  Resolution 8224: parental notification of prescription contraceptives for teenagers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Using medical care: the views and experiences of high-risk mothers.

Authors:  A Oakley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Dr. Mercer Rang responds.

Authors:  M Rang
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Prenatal high risk scoring: how family doctors do it.

Authors:  P Shea
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Electronic fetal monitoring in a small hospital. Part 2: intrapartum use.

Authors:  R I Casson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Automatic unit for monitoring and diagnosis with the contraction stress test.

Authors:  C Hernández Sande; A Alonso Betanzos; J E Arias Rodriguez
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Regionalization of perinatal services and the use of high-risk scoring forms.

Authors:  J P Sylvain
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  A study of pregnancy outcomes in a maternity center and a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  G Baruffi; W S Dellinger; D M Stobino; A Rudolph; R Y Timmons; A Ross
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Maternal and neonatal outcome in pregnancies with no risk factors.

Authors:  J M Moutquin; R Gagnon; C Rainville; L Giroux; G Amyot; R Bilodeau; P Raynauld
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1987-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Neonatal respiratory distress: potential for prevention.

Authors:  M J Lewins; J M Whitfield; G W Chance
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1979-05-05       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.