Literature DB >> 21277116

Out-of-field cell survival following exposure to intensity-modulated radiation fields.

Karl T Butterworth1, Conor K McGarry, Colman Trainor, Joe M O'Sullivan, Alan R Hounsell, Kevin M Prise.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the in-field and out-of-field cell survival of cells irradiated with either primary field or scattered radiation in the presence and absence of intercellular communication. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cell survival was determined by clonogenic assay in human prostate cancer (DU145) and primary fibroblast (AGO1552) cells following exposure to different field configurations delivered using a 6-MV photon beam produced with a Varian linear accelerator.
RESULTS: Nonuniform dose distributions were delivered using a multileaf collimator (MLC) in which half of the cell population was shielded. Clonogenic survival in the shielded region was significantly lower than that predicted from the linear quadratic model. In both cell lines, the out-of-field responses appeared to saturate at 40%-50% survival at a scattered dose of 0.70 Gy in DU-145 cells and 0.24 Gy in AGO1522 cells. There was an approximately eightfold difference in the initial slopes of the out-of-field response compared with the α-component of the uniform field response. In contrast, cells in the exposed part of the field showed increased survival. These observations were abrogated by direct physical inhibition of cellular communication and by the addition of the inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitor aminoguanidine known to inhibit intercellular bystander effects. Additional studies showed the proportion of cells irradiated and dose delivered to the shielded and exposed regions of the field to impact on response.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate out-of-field effects as important determinants of cell survival following exposure to modulated irradiation fields with cellular communication between differentially irradiated cell populations playing an important role. Validation of these observations in additional cell models may facilitate the refinement of existing radiobiological models and the observations considered important determinants of cell survival.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21277116      PMCID: PMC3061203          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  25 in total

1.  Low-dose studies of bystander cell killing with targeted soft X rays.

Authors:  G Schettino; M Folkard; K M Prise; B Vojnovic; K D Held; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Recovery from sublethal damage during intermittent exposures in cultured tumor cells: implications for dose modification in radiosurgery and IMRT.

Authors:  Yuta Shibamoto; Masato Ito; Chikao Sugie; Hiroyuki Ogino; Masaki Hara
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Modulation of the bystander effects induced by soluble factors in HaCaT cells by different exposure strategies.

Authors:  Maria Balduzzi; Orazio Sapora; Andrea Matteucci; Silvia Paradisi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  A Monte Carlo study of the variation of electron fluence in water from a 6 MV photon beam outside of the field.

Authors:  C Kirkby; C Field; M MacKenzie; A Syme; B G Fallone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Dilution of irradiated cell conditioned medium and the bystander effect.

Authors:  Lorna A Ryan; Richard W Smith; Colin B Seymour; Carmel E Mothersill
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Relative biological damage and electron fluence in and out of a 6 MV photon field.

Authors:  A Syme; C Kirkby; R Mirzayans; M MacKenzie; C Field; B G Fallone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Cellular response to modulated radiation fields.

Authors:  E Claridge Mackonis; N Suchowerska; M Zhang; M Ebert; D R McKenzie; M Jackson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Bystander cell killing in normal human fibroblasts is induced by synchrotron X-ray microbeams.

Authors:  Masanori Tomita; Munetoshi Maeda; Hiroshi Maezawa; Noriko Usami; Katsumi Kobayashi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Signaling factors for irradiated glioma cells induced bystander responses in fibroblasts.

Authors:  Chunlin Shao; Kevin M Prise; Melvyn Folkard
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Role of TGF-beta1 and nitric oxide in the bystander response of irradiated glioma cells.

Authors:  C Shao; M Folkard; K M Prise
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Bystander effects and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Alicia Marín; Margarita Martín; Olga Liñán; Felipe Alvarenga; Mario López; Laura Fernández; David Büchser; Laura Cerezo
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-08-28

Review 2.  Novel treatment planning approaches to enhance the therapeutic ratio: targeting the molecular mechanisms of radiation therapy.

Authors:  M Protopapa; V Kouloulias; A Kougioumtzopoulou; Z Liakouli; C Papadimitriou; A Zygogianni
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Reduced side effects by proton microchannel radiotherapy: study in a human skin model.

Authors:  Olga Zlobinskaya; Stefanie Girst; Christoph Greubel; Volker Hable; Christian Siebenwirth; Dietrich W M Walsh; Gabriele Multhoff; Jan J Wilkens; Thomas E Schmid; Günther Dollinger
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  An evaluation of novel real-time technology as a tool for measurement of radiobiological and radiation-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Mohammad Johari Ibahim; Jeffrey C Crosbie; Premila Paiva; Yuqing Yang; Marina Zaitseva; Peter A W Rogers
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Modelling responses to spatially fractionated radiation fields using preclinical image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Karl Terence Butterworth; Mihaela Ghita; Stephen J McMahon; Conor K Mcgarry; Robert J Griffin; Alan R Hounsell; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Microbeam radiation therapy alters vascular architecture and tumor oxygenation and is enhanced by a galectin-1 targeted anti-angiogenic peptide.

Authors:  Robert J Griffin; Nathan A Koonce; Ruud P M Dings; Eric Siegel; Eduardo G Moros; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Peter M Corry
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Spatially fractionated radiation induces cytotoxicity and changes in gene expression in bystander and radiation adjacent murine carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Rajalakshmi S Asur; Sunil Sharma; Ching-Wei Chang; Jose Penagaricano; Indira M Kommuru; Eduardo G Moros; Peter M Corry; Robert J Griffin
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 8.  High dose bystander effects in spatially fractionated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Rajalakshmi Asur; Karl T Butterworth; Jose A Penagaricano; Kevin M Prise; Robert J Griffin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  DNA damage responses following exposure to modulated radiation fields.

Authors:  Colman Trainor; Karl T Butterworth; Conor K McGarry; Stephen J McMahon; Joe M O'Sullivan; Alan R Hounsell; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A kinetic-based model of radiation-induced intercellular signalling.

Authors:  Stephen J McMahon; Karl T Butterworth; Colman Trainor; Conor K McGarry; Joe M O'Sullivan; Giuseppe Schettino; Alan R Hounsell; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.