Literature DB >> 19826205

Relative biological damage and electron fluence in and out of a 6 MV photon field.

A Syme1, C Kirkby, R Mirzayans, M MacKenzie, C Field, B G Fallone.   

Abstract

Scattered radiation in the penumbra of a megavoltage radiation therapy beam can deposit a non-negligible dose in the healthy tissue around a target volume. The lower energy of the radiation in this region suggests that its biological effectiveness might not be the same as that of the open beam. In this work, we determined the relative biological damage in normal human fibroblasts after megavoltage irradiation in two geometries. The first was an open-beam irradiation and the second was a blocked configuration in which only scattered radiation could reach the target cells. The biological damage was evaluated by the gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence assay, which is capable of detecting DNA double-strand breaks in individual cells. We report that the scattered radiation is more effective at producing biological damage than the open beam radiation. We found a 27% enhancement in the net mean nuclear gamma-H2AX fluorescence intensity at 2 Gy and a 48% enhancement at 4 Gy. These findings are of interest due to the increased doses of penumbral radiation close to target volumes both in dose escalation studies and in IMRT treatment deliveries where high dose gradients exist for the purpose of conformal avoidance of healthy tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19826205     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/21/012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  The effect of energy spectrum change on DNA damage in and out of field in 10-MV clinical photon beams.

Authors:  A O Ezzati; Y Xiao; M Sohrabpour; M T Studenski
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Cellular Damage in the Target and Out-Of-Field Peripheral Organs during VMAT SBRT Prostate Radiotherapy: An In Vitro Phantom-Based Study.

Authors:  Igor Piotrowski; Katarzyna Kulcenty; Wiktoria Suchorska; Marcin Rucinski; Karol Jopek; Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska; Agnieszka Skrobala; Piotr Romanski; Adam Ryczkowski; Dorota Borowicz; Natalia Matuszak; Julian Malicki
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Average stopping powers for electron and photon sources for radiobiological modeling and microdosimetric applications.

Authors:  Oleg N Vassiliev; Stephen F Kry; David R Grosshans; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  High dose bystander effects in spatially fractionated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Rajalakshmi Asur; Karl T Butterworth; Jose A Penagaricano; Kevin M Prise; Robert J Griffin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  Out-of-field cell survival following exposure to intensity-modulated radiation fields.

Authors:  Karl T Butterworth; Conor K McGarry; Colman Trainor; Joe M O'Sullivan; Alan R Hounsell; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  In vivo measurement of dose distribution in patients' lymphocytes: helical tomotherapy versus step-and-shoot IMRT in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Felix Zwicker; Benedict Swartman; Falk Roeder; Florian Sterzing; Henrik Hauswald; Christian Thieke; Klaus-Josef Weber; Peter E Huber; Kai Schubert; Jürgen Debus; Klaus Herfarth
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  DNA damage responses following exposure to modulated radiation fields.

Authors:  Colman Trainor; Karl T Butterworth; Conor K McGarry; Stephen J McMahon; Joe M O'Sullivan; Alan R Hounsell; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.