Literature DB >> 14565833

Low-dose studies of bystander cell killing with targeted soft X rays.

G Schettino1, M Folkard, K M Prise, B Vojnovic, K D Held, B D Michael.   

Abstract

The Gray Cancer Institute ultrasoft X-ray microprobe was used to quantify the bystander response of individual V79 cells exposed to a focused carbon K-shell (278 eV) X-ray beam. The ultrasoft X-ray microprobe is designed to precisely assess the biological response of individual cells irradiated in vitro with a very fine beam of low-energy photons. Characteristic CK X rays are generated by a focused beam of 10 keV electrons striking a graphite target. Circular diffraction gratings (i.e. zone plates) are then employed to focus the X-ray beam into a spot with a radius of 0.25 microm at the sample position. Using this microbeam technology, the correlation between the irradiated cells and their nonirradiated neighbors can be examined critically. The survival response of V79 cells irradiated with a CK X-ray beam was measured in the 0-2-Gy dose range. The response when all cells were irradiated was compared to that obtained when only a single cell was exposed. The cell survival data exhibit a linear-quadratic response when all cells were targeted (with evidence for hypersensitivity at low doses). When only a single cell was targeted within the population, 10% cell killing was measured. In contrast to the binary bystander behavior reported by many other investigations, the effect detected was initially dependent on dose (<200 mGy) and then reached a plateau (>200 mGy). In the low-dose region (<200 mGy), the response after irradiation of a single cell was not significantly different from that when all cells were exposed to radiation. Damaged cells were distributed uniformly over the area of the dish scanned (approximately 25 mm2). However, critical analysis of the distance of the damaged, unirradiated cells from other damaged cells revealed the presence of clusters of damaged cells produced under bystander conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14565833     DOI: 10.1667/rr3060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  22 in total

1.  The balance between initiation and promotion in radiation-induced murine carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; Robert L Ullrich; Rainer K Sachs; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  MCNP5 evaluation of dose dissipation in tissue-like media exposed to low-energy monoenergetic X-ray microbeam.

Authors:  Shaun D Clarke; Tatjana Jevremovic
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Demonstration of a radiation-induced bystander effect for low dose low LET beta-particles.

Authors:  Rudranath Persaud; Hongning Zhou; Tom K Hei; Eric J Hall
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  Challenges and progress in predicting biological responses to incorporated radioactivity.

Authors:  R W Howell; P V S V Neti; M Pinto; B I Gerashchenko; V R Narra; E I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 5.  Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Joe M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Does the number of irradiated cells influence the spatial distribution of bystander effects?

Authors:  A Belchior; I Balásházy; O Monteiro Gil; P Vaz; P Almeida
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  On the Inclusion of Short-distance Bystander Effects into a Logistic Tumor Control Probability Model.

Authors:  David G Tempel; N Patrik Brodin; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-01-01

8.  Investigation of adaptive responses in bystander cells in 3D cultures containing tritium-labeled and unlabeled normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Massimo Pinto; Edouard I Azzam; Roger W Howell
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Uncomfortable issues in radiation protection posed by low-dose radiobiology.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 10.  Microbeam studies of the bystander response.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Giuseppe Schettino; Boris Vojnovic; Oleg Belyakov; Chunlin Shao
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.