Literature DB >> 26994995

An evaluation of novel real-time technology as a tool for measurement of radiobiological and radiation-induced bystander effects.

Mohammad Johari Ibahim1,2, Jeffrey C Crosbie3,4, Premila Paiva1, Yuqing Yang1, Marina Zaitseva1, Peter A W Rogers5.   

Abstract

The xCELLigence real-time cell impedance system uses a non-invasive and label-free method to create a cell index that is a composite measure of cell proliferation. The aim of this study was to evaluate xCELLigence against clonogenic assay (gold standard) for measuring radiobiological effects and radiation-induced bystander effects (RIBE). A radiobiological study was conducted by irradiating EMT6.5, 4T1.2 and NMUMG cell lines with different radiation doses, while a RIBE study was done using transfer of conditioned media (CM) harvested from donor to the same type of recipient cell (EMT6.5, 4T1.2, NMUMG, HACAT and SW48). CM was harvested using two protocols which differed in the dose chosen and the exposure to the recipient cells. Results showed that xCELLigence measured a radiobiological effect which correlated with the clonogenic assay. For the RIBE study, no statistically significant differences were observed between xCELLigence or clonogenic survival in control or recipient cells incubated with CM in protocol one. However, there was a significant increase in cell index slope using CM from EMT-6.5 cells irradiated at 7.5 Gy compared with the control group under the second protocol. No other evidence of RIBE was detected by either xCELLigence or clonogenic assay. In conclusion, xCELLigence methods can measure radiobiological effects and the results correlate with clonogenic assay. We observed a lack of RIBE in all tested cell lines with the clonogenic assay; however, we observed a RIBE effect in EMT6.5 cells under one particular protocol that showed RIBE is cell type dependent, is not universally observed and can be detected in different assays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bystander effects; Clonogenic assay; Radiotherapy; xCELLigence RT-CIS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26994995     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-016-0641-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  42 in total

1.  Relationship between radiation-induced low-dose hypersensitivity and the bystander effect.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; C B Seymour; M C Joiner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of alpha-particles.

Authors:  H Nagasawa; J B Little
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Bystander signal production and response are independent processes which are cell line dependent.

Authors:  Alice M Vines; Fiona M Lyng; Brendan McClean; Colin Seymour; Carmel E Mothersill
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  Radiation-induced bystander effects: evidence for an adaptive response to low dose exposures?

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Lack of evidence for low-LET radiation induced bystander response in normal human fibroblasts and colon carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Marianne B Sowa; Wilfried Goetz; Janet E Baulch; Dinah N Pyles; Jaroslaw Dziegielewski; Susannah Yovino; Andrew R Snyder; Sonia M de Toledo; Edouard I Azzam; William F Morgan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Medium from irradiated human epithelial cells but not human fibroblasts reduces the clonogenic survival of unirradiated cells.

Authors:  C Mothersill; C Seymour
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  Cell-cell contact during gamma irradiation is not required to induce a bystander effect in normal human keratinocytes: evidence for release during irradiation of a signal controlling survival into the medium.

Authors:  C Mothersill; C B Seymour
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Real-time cell-impedance sensing assay as an alternative to clonogenic assay in evaluating cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Wilson Roa; Xiaoyan Yang; Linghong Guo; Biao Huang; Shima Khatibisepehr; Stephan Gabos; Jie Chen; James Xing
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.142

9.  Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha -particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; S M de Toledo; J B Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Action of x-rays on mammalian cells.

Authors:  T T PUCK; P I MARCUS
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1956-05-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of The Dose-Response Relationship of Radiation-Induced Bystander Effect in Two Cell Lines Exposed to High Doses of Ionizing Radiation (6 and 8 Gy).

Authors:  Mohammad Taghi Bahreyni Toossi; Sara Khademi; Hosein Azimian; Shokoufeh Mohebbi; Shokouhozaman Soleymanifard
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.479

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.