Literature DB >> 15275736

Recovery from sublethal damage during intermittent exposures in cultured tumor cells: implications for dose modification in radiosurgery and IMRT.

Yuta Shibamoto1, Masato Ito, Chikao Sugie, Hiroyuki Ogino, Masaki Hara.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In stereotactic irradiation using a linear accelerator and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), radiation is administered intermittently, and 30 min or longer is often required in one treatment session. The purpose of the present study was to determine how different the dose delivered with such intermissions is from that delivered continuously and to estimate dose-modifying factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Murine EMT6 and SCCVII cells in culture were used. First, two doses of 4 Gy were given with an interruption of 15 min to 6 h or 1-10 min, or without interruption. Next, five fractions of 1.6 Gy were given with interfraction intervals of 1 to 5 min each. Doses of 6.5-8 Gy were also given without interruption to estimate dose-modifying factors. Cell survival was determined by a colony assay. Furthermore, a total dose of 2 Gy was given in 5 or 10 even fractions at intervals of 1-5 min or 30 s-3 min each, respectively, and the results were compared with those obtained after 1.6-2 Gy delivered continuously by using a cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay.
RESULTS: In the two-fraction experiments, a significant increase in cell survival resulting from recovery from sublethal damage (SLDR) was observed when the interruption time was 2 min or longer in EMT6 cells and 3 min or longer in SCCVII. With a 5-min interval, cell survival increased by 13% in EMT6 and by 18% in SCCVII. In the five-fraction experiments, SLDR was evident when the interfraction interval was 2 min or longer in both 8-Gy and 2-Gy dose experiments. In the 10-fraction experiment using a dose of 2 Gy, SLDR was evident when the interfraction interval was 1 min or longer. In the 5-fraction and 10-fraction experiments, the dose-modifying factors were between 1.08 and 1.16 when the total time for irradiation was between 20 and 30 min.
CONCLUSIONS: The effects of stereotactic radiosurgery and IMRT that require considerably long beam interruption (e.g., 8 min or longer in total) may be less than those of the same dose administered continuously. In treatments that take 20 min or longer, dose modification appears necessary based on biologically estimated dose-modifying factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15275736     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  23 in total

1.  Treatment planning and dosimetry of a multi-axis dynamic arc technique for prostate cancer: A comparison with IMRT.

Authors:  Kenshiro Shiraishi; Keiichi Nakagawa; Hideomi Yamashita; Naoki Nakamura; Masao Tago; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-01

2.  A study of the biological effects of modulated 6 MV radiation fields.

Authors:  Karl T Butterworth; Conor K McGarry; Joe M O'Sullivan; Alan R Hounsell; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Plan comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) and conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in anal canal cancer.

Authors:  Sabine Vieillot; David Azria; Claire Lemanski; Carmen Llacer Moscardo; Sophie Gourgou; Jean-Bernard Dubois; Norbert Aillères; Pascal Fenoglietto
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 4.  Radiotherapy for metastatic brain tumors.

Authors:  Yuta Shibamoto; Chikao Sugie; Hiromitsu Iwata
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Dosimetry Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Rapid Arcand Fixed Field Dynamic IMRT for Local-Regionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Bao-Min Zheng; Xiao-Xia Dong; Hao Wu; Shu-Kui Han; Yan Sun
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Out-of-field cell survival following exposure to intensity-modulated radiation fields.

Authors:  Karl T Butterworth; Conor K McGarry; Colman Trainor; Joe M O'Sullivan; Alan R Hounsell; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Impact of decaying dose rate in gamma knife radiosurgery: in vitro study on 9L rat gliosarcoma cells.

Authors:  Ajay Niranjan; Glenn Gobbel; Josef Novotny; Jagdish Bhatnagar; Wendy Fellows; L Dade Lunsford
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2012

8.  Dose compensation based on biological effectiveness due to interruption time for photon radiation therapy.

Authors:  Daisuke Kawahara; Hisashi Nakano; Akito Saito; Shuichi Ozawa; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  In vitro and in vivo studies on radiobiological effects of prolonged fraction delivery time in A549 cells.

Authors:  Ling Jiang; Xiao-Peng Xiong; Chao-Su Hu; Zhou-Luo Ou; Guo-Pei Zhu; Hong-Mei Ying
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Compatibility of the repairable-conditionally repairable, multi-target and linear-quadratic models in converting hypofractionated radiation doses to single doses.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Iwata; Naruhiro Matsufuji; Toshiyuki Toshito; Takashi Akagi; Shinya Otsuka; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.