Literature DB >> 1506532

Intensity discrimination in forward masking.

F G Zeng1, C W Turner.   

Abstract

A nonmonotonic intensity discrimination function was recently reported in which a midlevel hump occurred for 25-ms sinusoidal standards ranging from 20 to 100 dB SPL and presented 100 ms after an intense narrow-band noise forward masker [F.-G. Zeng et al., Hear. Res. 55, 223-230 (1991)]. This paper provides additional data on how the midlevel hump is affected by three factors of forward masking: signal delay, masker level, and frequency. Specifically, just-noticeable differences (jnd's) in intensity were obtained at signal delays of 50, 200, and 400 ms. Results show that at the midlevels the forward-masked intensity jnd's did not recover to their unmasked values, even at the 400-ms signal delay. The longer the signal delay, the smaller this midlevel hump. This slow recovery of the midlevel jnd's is consistent with the finding that low-spontaneous rate (SR) neurons have a slow recovery from forward masking [E. M. Relkin and J. R. Doucet, Hear. Res. 55, 215-222 (1991)]. The large midlevel effect decreased sharply as masker level was reduced from 90 to 60 dB SPL, and disappeared for masker levels less than 40 dB SPL. A frequency selectivity effect for the large midlevel jnd effect was also observed, as maskers with frequency components 2 to 3 oct away from the signal frequency did not affect the jnd's. Overall, the present data are consistent with the hypothesis of Zeng et al. (1991) that low-SR neurons are involved in the midlevel hump of intensity discrimination in forward masking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1506532     DOI: 10.1121/1.403947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Evaluating adaptation and olivocochlear efferent feedback as potential explanations of psychophysical overshoot.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Michael G Heinz; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-26

2.  Optimizing non-invasive functional markers for cochlear deafferentation based on electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Jianxin Bao
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Evidence for Loss of Activity in Low-Spontaneous-Rate Auditory Nerve Fibers of Older Adults.

Authors:  Carolyn M McClaskey; James W Dias; Richard A Schmiedt; Judy R Dubno; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-12

4.  The impact of preceding noise on the frequency tuning of rat auditory cortex neurons.

Authors:  Yinting Peng; Pengpeng Xing; Juan He; Xinde Sun; Jiping Zhang
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 5.  The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.974

6.  Sensorimotor Integration Can Enhance Auditory Perception.

Authors:  John C Myers; Jeffrey R Mock; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Temporal Loudness Weights Are Frequency Specific.

Authors:  Alexander Fischenich; Jan Hots; Jesko Verhey; Daniel Oberfeld
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-19

8.  Sequential grouping modulates the effect of non-simultaneous masking on auditory intensity resolution.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Patricia Stahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Factors limiting performance in a multitone intensity-discrimination task: disentangling non-optimal decision weights and increased internal noise.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Martha Kuta; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Why do forward maskers affect auditory intensity discrimination? Evidence from "molecular psychophysics".

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Patricia Stahn; Martha Kuta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.