Literature DB >> 21264747

When here becomes there: attentional distribution modulates foveal bias in peripheral localization.

Francesca C Fortenbaugh1, Lynn C Robertson.   

Abstract

Much research concerning attention has focused on changes in the perceptual qualities of objects while attentional states were varied. Here, we address a complementary question--namely, how perceived location can be altered by the distribution of sustained attention over the visual field. We also present a new way to assess the effects of distributing spatial attention across the visual field. We measured magnitude judgments relative to an aperture edge to test perceived location across a large range of eccentricities (30°), and manipulated spatial uncertainty in target locations to examine perceived location under three different distributions of spatial attention. Across three experiments, the results showed that changing the distribution of sustained attention significantly alters known foveal biases in peripheral localization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264747      PMCID: PMC3063879          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-010-0075-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  53 in total

1.  Relative mislocalization of briefly presented stimuli in the retinal periphery.

Authors:  J Müsseler; A H van der Heijden; S H Mahmud; H Deubel; S Ertsey
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-11

2.  Memory for the position of stationary objects: disentangling foveal bias and memory averaging.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Sources of position-perception error for small isolated targets.

Authors:  A H van der Heijden; J N van der Geest; F de Leeuw; K Krikke; J Müsseler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1999

4.  Temporal performance fields: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Anna Marie Giordano; Brian McElree
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Attention alters appearance.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Sam Ling; Sarah Read
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Effects of attention on a relative mislocalization with successively presented stimuli.

Authors:  Diana Bocianski; Jochen Müsseler; Wolfram Erlhagen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Mislocalization of a target toward subjective contours: attentional modulation of location signals.

Authors:  Yuki Yamada; Takahiro Kawabe; Kayo Miura
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-02-28

8.  Magnocellular and parvocellular visual pathway contributions to visual field anisotropies.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Michael W Levine
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  On the time course and accuracy of spatial localization: basic data and a two-process model.

Authors:  J J Adam; M Ketelaars; H Kingma; T Hoek
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1993-11

10.  Peripheral vision and perceived visual direction.

Authors:  S Mateeff; A Gourevich
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.086

View more
  11 in total

1.  Spatial distortions in localization and midline estimation in hemianopia and normal vision.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Thomas M VanVleet; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over posterior parietal cortex modulates visuospatial localization.

Authors:  Jessica M Wright; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Weighted integration of visual position information.

Authors:  Jessica M Wright; Adam P Morris; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Invalidly cued targets are well localized when detected.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Junjun Zhang; Sarah Shomstein; Joseph C Nah; John W Philbeck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Exploring the edges of visual space: the influence of visual boundaries on peripheral localization.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Shradha Sanghvi; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Attentional enhancement of spatial resolution: linking behavioural and neurophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Auditory Localisation Biases Increase with Sensory Uncertainty.

Authors:  Sara E Garcia; Pete R Jones; Gary S Rubin; Marko Nardini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Fixation strategy influences the ability to focus attention on two spatially separate objects.

Authors:  Stefanie Hüttermann; Daniel Memmert; Daniel J Simons; Otmar Bock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Biases in Visual, Auditory, and Audiovisual Perception of Space.

Authors:  Brian Odegaard; David R Wozny; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Multisensory stimuli improve relative localisation judgments compared to unisensory auditory or visual stimuli.

Authors:  Laura C A Freeman; Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.