Literature DB >> 20542056

Effects of attention on a relative mislocalization with successively presented stimuli.

Diana Bocianski1, Jochen Müsseler, Wolfram Erlhagen.   

Abstract

Previous studies yielded evidence that the precision, with which stimuli are localized in the visual periphery, is improved under conditions of focused attention. The present study examined whether focused attention is able to correct a mislocalization recently observed with successively presented stimuli: when observers are asked to localize the peripheral position of a briefly presented target with respect to a previously presented comparison stimulus, they tended to judge the target as being more towards the fovea than was its actual position. In three experiments the mislocalization was tested under conditions with focused and distributed attention. Results revealed that the mislocalization increased with distributed attention and disappeared when stimuli appeared consistently at predictable positions and thus under conditions of focused attention. However, when a procedure with a trial-by-trial cueing was applied the mislocalization was only reduced, but not wiped out completely. In a recently developed dynamic field model consisting of interacting excitatory and inhibitory neuronal cell populations the results were explained as an attentional modulation of spontaneous (baseline) levels of neural activity. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20542056     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over posterior parietal cortex modulates visuospatial localization.

Authors:  Jessica M Wright; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  When here becomes there: attentional distribution modulates foveal bias in peripheral localization.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Weighted integration of visual position information.

Authors:  Jessica M Wright; Adam P Morris; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Interactions of flicker and motion.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Sion Gutentag; Christopher D Blair; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Exploring the edges of visual space: the influence of visual boundaries on peripheral localization.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Shradha Sanghvi; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The perceived onset position of a moving target: effects of trial contexts are evoked by different attentional allocations.

Authors:  Jochen Müsseler; Jens Tiggelbeck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Retrospective perceptual distortion of position representation does not lead to delayed localization.

Authors:  Ricky K C Au; Fuminori Ono; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-03-15

8.  Nonretinocentric localization of successively presented flashes during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Stefan Dowiasch; Sonia Meyer-Stender; Steffen Klingenhoefer; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.