Literature DB >> 11809470

Memory for the position of stationary objects: disentangling foveal bias and memory averaging.

Dirk Kerzel1.   

Abstract

The perceived and remembered position of stationary target objects is subject to a large number of distortions. Objects are localized toward the fovea, and when an additional object (distractor) is presented, a tendency to average target and distractor position was observed. These distortions in visual short-term memory have been referred to as foveal bias and memory averaging, respectively. Because most studies on memory averaging did not monitor eye fixation, foveal bias and memory averaging may have been confounded. That is, observers may have fixated the distractor. To disentangle these factors, target and distractor were presented in the periphery, and fixation was monitored. Memory averaging was not observed. Rather a bias away from the distractor occurred when the distractor was briefly presented during the retention interval, or when it was visible throughout the trial. In contrast, a foveal bias was observed regardless of whether an additional object was present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11809470     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00274-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  22 in total

1.  Asynchronous perception of motion and luminance change.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-03-07

2.  Displacement of location in illusory line motion.

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard; Susan E Ruppel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-03-08

3.  Attentional load modulates mislocalization of moving stimuli, but does not eliminate the error.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

4.  Motion-induced illusory displacement reexamined: differences between perception and action?

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Representational momentum in spatial hearing does not depend on eye movements.

Authors:  Stephan Getzmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Why eye movements and perceptual factors have to be controlled in studies on "representational momentum".

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

7.  Increased repulsion of working memory representations in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sonia Bansal; Gi-Yeul Bae; Kyle Frankovich; Benjamin M Robinson; Carly J Leonard; James M Gold; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2020-09-03

8.  Sensory compensation in sound localization in people with one eye.

Authors:  Adria E N Hoover; Laurence R Harris; Jennifer K E Steeves
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  When here becomes there: attentional distribution modulates foveal bias in peripheral localization.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Distance estimation is influenced by encoding conditions.

Authors:  Anna Oleksiak; Mirosława Mańko; Albert Postma; Ineke J M van der Ham; Albert V van den Berg; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.