Literature DB >> 21264594

Informed inferences of unknown feature values in categorization.

Michael J Wood1, Mark R Blair.   

Abstract

Many current computational models of object categorization either include no explicit provisions for dealing with incomplete stimulus information (e.g. Kruschke, Psychological Review 99:22-44, 1992) or take approaches that are at odds with evidence from other fields (e.g. Verguts, Ameel, & Storms, Memory & Cognition 32:379-389, 2004). In two experiments centered around the inverse base-rate effect, we demonstrate that people not only make highly informed inferences about the values of unknown features, but also subsequently use the inferred values to come to a categorization decision. The inferences appear to be based on immediately available information about the particular stimulus under consideration, as well as on higher-level inferences about the stimulus class as a whole. Implications for future modeling efforts are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264594     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-010-0044-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

1.  High-level reasoning and base-rate use: do we need cue-competition to explain the inverse base-rate effect?

Authors:  P Juslin; P Wennerholm; A Winman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Can attentional theory explain the inverse base rate effect? Comment on Kruschke (2001).

Authors:  Anders Winman; Pia Wennerholm; Peter Juslin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Measures of similarity in models of categorization.

Authors:  Tom Verguts; Eef Ameel; Gert Storms
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04

4.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience.

Authors:  D L Medin; S M Edelson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

6.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri; S C McKinley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Evidence for rule-based processes in the inverse base-rate effect.

Authors:  Anders Winman; Pia Wennerholm; Peter Juslin; David R Shanks
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-07

8.  Missing information in multiple-cue probability learning.

Authors:  Chris M White; Derek J Koehler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

9.  Base rates in category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning.

Authors:  Bradley C Love; Douglas L Medin; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  2 in total

1.  Highlighting in Early Childhood: Learning Biases Through Attentional Shifting.

Authors:  Joseph M Burling; Hanako Yoshida
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-16

2.  LAG-1: A dynamic, integrative model of learning, attention, and gaze.

Authors:  Jordan Barnes; Mark R Blair; R Calen Walshe; Paul F Tupper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.