Literature DB >> 21264566

Simultaneous discrimination reversal learning in pigeons and humans: anticipatory and perseverative errors.

Rebecca M Rayburn-Reeves1, Mikaël Molet, Thomas R Zentall.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained on a two-choice simultaneous discrimination (red vs. green) that reversed midway through each session. After considerable training, they consistently made both anticipatory errors prior to the reversal and perseverative errors after the reversal, suggesting that time (or number of trials) into the session served as a cue for reversal. In Experiment 2, to discourage the use of time as a cue, we varied the location of the reversal point within the session such that it occurred semirandomly after Trial 10, 25, 40, 55, or 70. Pigeons still tended both to anticipate and to perseverate. In Experiment 3, we required 20 pecks to a stimulus on each trial to facilitate memory for the preceding response and sensitivity to local reinforcement contingencies, but the results were similar to those of Experiment 2. We then tested humans on a similar task with a constant (Experiment 4) or variable (Experiment 5) reversal location. When the reversal occurred consistently at the midpoint of the session, humans, like pigeons, showed a tendency to anticipate the reversal; however, they did not show perseverative errors. When the reversal location varied between sessions, unlike pigeons, humans adopted a win-stay/lose-shift strategy, making only a single error on the first trial of the reversal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264566     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-010-0011-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  18 in total

1.  Smells are no surer: rapid improvement in olfactory discrimination is not due to the acquisition of a learning set.

Authors:  I C Reid; R G Morris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1992-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Temporal control of internal states in pigeons.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Hara A Rosen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

3.  The comparative analysis of learning.

Authors:  M E Bitterman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The formation of learning sets.

Authors:  H F HARLOW
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1949-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Serial discrimination reversal learning in pigeons as a function of intertrial interval and delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  Bertram O Ploog; Ben A Williams
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Properties of time-place learning by pigeons, Columba livia.

Authors:  D M Wilkie; L M Saksida; P Samson; A Lee
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions.

Authors:  A Bechara; D Tranel; H Damasio
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Further evidence of joint time-place control of rats' behavior: results from an 'open hopper' test.

Authors:  J A.R. Carr; A O. Tan; C M. Thorpe; D M. Wilkie
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2001-04-26       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Pigs in space: spatial memory and its susceptibility to interference.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Serial reversal learning and the evolution of behavioral flexibility in three species of North American corvids (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus, Nucifraga columbiana, Aphelocoma californica).

Authors:  Alan B Bond; Alan C Kamil; Russell P Balda
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  13 in total

1.  Midsession reversal learning by pigeons: Effect on accuracy of increasing the number of stimuli associated with one of the alternatives.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Daniel N Peng; Dalton C House; Ryan Yadav
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Generalizing from the Past, Choosing the Future.

Authors:  Sarah Cowie; Michael Davison
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2020-06-11

3.  Pigeons show near-optimal win-stay/lose-shift performance on a simultaneous-discrimination, midsession reversal task with short intertrial intervals.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rayburn-Reeves; Jennifer R Laude; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Midsession shifts in reward probability and the control of behavioral variability.

Authors:  W David Stahlman; Kenneth J Leising
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Repeated acquisition and discrimination reversal in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus).

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Jack Bergman
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Rats' midsession reversal performance: the nature of the response.

Authors:  Aaron P Smith; Kristina F Pattison; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Midsession reversal learning: why do pigeons anticipate and perseverate?

Authors:  Jessica P Stagner; Daniel M Michler; Rebecca M Rayburn-Reeves; Jennifer R Laude; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Midsession reversals with pigeons: visual versus spatial discriminations and the intertrial interval.

Authors:  Jennifer R Laude; Jessica P Stagner; Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  The Organization of Behavior Over Time: Insights from Mid-Session Reversal.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rayburn-Reeves; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2016

10.  Pigeons' use of cues in a repeated five-trial-sequence, single-reversal task.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rayburn-Reeves; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.