Literature DB >> 9794774

Pigs in space: spatial memory and its susceptibility to interference.

.   

Abstract

This study provided basic information about spatial memory in the domestic pig, Sus scrofa and examined how susceptible it is to disruption by environmental stimuli. Eight male pigs were tested individually in a foraging arena. Each day, they entered the arena to search for food randomly located in one of 10 enclosed areas (search trial). After finding and eating the food, they were removed from the arena for a retention interval, and then allowed back in to relocate the food in the same area as previously (relocation trial). Once pigs had achieved a criterion level of performance in relocation trials, 'disturbances' (e.g. isolation, novel food source, novel spatial environment) were presented during the retention interval. Disturbance days were separated by control days on which no disturbance was presented. During search trials, pigs did not use food-related cues to locate food, but appeared to use memory to search systematically and avoid revisits to empty areas. During relocation trials, they found food using fewer area visits than expected by chance, indicating that they could remember the location of food across both 10-min and 2-h retention intervals. Disturbances administered during 10-min retention intervals resulted in more relocation errors than on corresponding control days, indicating that spatial memory in pigs is susceptible to interference by relatively mild environmental stimuli, in contrast to that in rats, Rattus norvegicus and pigeons, Columba livia which appears to be highly resistant to retroactive interference even when potent stimuli are used. Analysis of error locations suggested that disturbances probably acted to increase the general area in which the pig remembered the food to be located, and so reduced accuracy of memory without eradicating it. There was no evidence that errors made during relocation trials represented sampling of areas not visited during the preceding search trial.Copyright 1997 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 9794774     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  11 in total

1.  Brownian motion or Lévy walk? Stepping towards an extended statistical mechanics for animal locomotion.

Authors:  Arild O Gautestad
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Simultaneous discrimination reversal learning in pigeons and humans: anticipatory and perseverative errors.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rayburn-Reeves; Mikaël Molet; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Assessing cognitive performance in dairy calves using a modified hole-board test.

Authors:  Benjamin Lecorps; Raphaela E Woodroffe; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 4.  Assessing learning and memory in pigs.

Authors:  Elise Titia Gieling; Rebecca Elizabeth Nordquist; Franz Josef van der Staay
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Post-weaning social and cognitive performance of piglets raised pre-weaning either in a complex multi-suckling group housing system or in a conventional system with a crated sow.

Authors:  S E van Nieuwamerongen; M Mendl; S Held; N M Soede; J E Bolhuis
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  More Than Eggs - Relationship Between Productivity and Learning in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Anissa Dudde; E Tobias Krause; Lindsay R Matthews; Lars Schrader
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-26

7.  Spatiotemporal Effects of Supplementary Feeding of Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) on Artificial Ground Nest Depredation.

Authors:  Ragne Oja; Karoline Zilmer; Harri Valdmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cognitive enrichment in piglet rearing: an approach to enhance animal welfare and to reduce aggressive behaviour.

Authors:  Lilia Thays Sonoda; Michaela Fels; Sally Rauterberg; Stefano Viazzi; Gunel Ismayilova; Maciej Oczak; Claudia Bahr; Marcella Guarino; Erik Vranken; Daniel Berckmans; Jörg Hartung
Journal:  ISRN Vet Sci       Date:  2013-10-01

9.  Overnight Social Isolation in Pigs Decreases Salivary Cortisol but Does Not Impair Spatial Learning and Memory or Performance in a Decision-Making Task.

Authors:  F Josef van der Staay; Annelieke J Schoonderwoerd; Bo Stadhouders; Rebecca E Nordquist
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-01-11

10.  Low Birth Weight Impairs Acquisition of Spatial Memory Task in Pigs.

Authors:  Sanne Roelofs; Ilse van Bommel; Stephanie Melis; Franz J van der Staay; Rebecca E Nordquist
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.