Literature DB >> 11050020

Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions.

A Bechara1, D Tranel, H Damasio.   

Abstract

On a gambling task that models real-life decisions, patients with bilateral lesions of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VM) opt for choices that yield high immediate gains in spite of higher future losses. In this study, we addressed three possibilities that may account for this behaviour: (i) hypersensitivity to reward; (ii) insensitivity to punishment; and (iii) insensitivity to future consequences, such that behaviour is always guided by immediate prospects. For this purpose, we designed a variant of the original gambling task in which the advantageous decks yielded high immediate punishment but even higher future reward. The disadvantageous decks yielded low immediate punishment but even lower future reward. We measured the skin conductance responses (SCRs) of subjects after they had received a reward or punishment. Patients with VM lesions opted for the disadvantageous decks in both the original and variant versions of the gambling task. The SCRs of VM lesion patients after they had received a reward or punishment were not significantly different from those of controls. In a second experiment, we investigated whether increasing the delayed punishment in the disadvantageous decks of the original task or decreasing the delayed reward in the disadvantageous decks of the variant task would shift the behaviour of VM lesion patients towards an advantageous strategy. Both manipulations failed to shift the behaviour of VM lesion patients away from the disadvantageous decks. These results suggest that patients with VM lesions are insensitive to future consequences, positive or negative, and are primarily guided by immediate prospects. This 'myopia for the future' in VM lesion patients persists in the face of severe adverse consequences, i.e. rising future punishment or declining future reward.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11050020     DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.11.2189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  455 in total

Review 1.  Frontal lobe functions.

Authors:  C Chayer; M Freedman
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 2.  Dopamine tunes prefrontal outputs to orchestrate aversive processing.

Authors:  Caitlin M Vander Weele; Cody A Siciliano; Kay M Tye
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  The amygdala and decision-making.

Authors:  Rupa Gupta; Timothy R Koscik; Antoine Bechara; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Thalamic alterations in preterm neonates and their relation to ventral striatum disturbances revealed by a combined shape and pose analysis.

Authors:  Yi Lao; Yalin Wang; Jie Shi; Rafael Ceschin; Marvin D Nelson; Ashok Panigrahy; Natasha Leporé
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.270

5.  Probabilistic classification and gambling in patients with schizophrenia receiving medication: comparison of risperidone, olanzapine, clozapine and typical antipsychotics.

Authors:  James I Wasserman; Rebecca J Barry; Lisa Bradford; Nicholas J Delva; Richard J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Modulation of value representation by social context in the primate orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  João C B Azzi; Angela Sirigu; Jean-René Duhamel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Orbital prefrontal cortex volume predicts social network size: an imaging study of individual differences in humans.

Authors:  Joanne Powell; Penelope A Lewis; Neil Roberts; Marta García-Fiñana; R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  The sleep-deprived human brain.

Authors:  Adam J Krause; Eti Ben Simon; Bryce A Mander; Stephanie M Greer; Jared M Saletin; Andrea N Goldstein-Piekarski; Matthew P Walker
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Inactivation of the prelimbic or infralimbic cortex impairs decision-making in the rat gambling task.

Authors:  Fiona D Zeeb; P J J Baarendse; L J M J Vanderschuren; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Somatic markers, working memory, and decision making.

Authors:  John M Hinson; Tina L Jameson; Paul Whitney
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.