Literature DB >> 26854532

The relationship between visual attention and visual working memory encoding: A dissociation between covert and overt orienting.

A Caglar Tas1, Steven J Luck2, Andrew Hollingworth3.   

Abstract

There is substantial debate over whether visual working memory (VWM) and visual attention constitute a single system for the selection of task-relevant perceptual information or whether they are distinct systems that can be dissociated when their representational demands diverge. In the present study, we focused on the relationship between visual attention and the encoding of objects into VWM. Participants performed a color change-detection task. During the retention interval, a secondary object, irrelevant to the memory task, was presented. Participants were instructed either to execute an overt shift of gaze to this object (Experiments 1-3) or to attend it covertly (Experiments 4 and 5). Our goal was to determine whether these overt and covert shifts of attention disrupted the information held in VWM. We hypothesized that saccades, which typically introduce a memorial demand to bridge perceptual disruption, would lead to automatic encoding of the secondary object. However, purely covert shifts of attention, which introduce no such demand, would not result in automatic memory encoding. The results supported these predictions. Saccades to the secondary object produced substantial interference with VWM performance, but covert shifts of attention to this object produced no interference with VWM performance. These results challenge prevailing theories that consider attention and VWM to reflect a common mechanism. In addition, they indicate that the relationship between attention and VWM is dependent on the memorial demands of the orienting behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26854532      PMCID: PMC4977214          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  92 in total

1.  The role of spatial working memory in inhibition of return: evidence from divided attention tasks.

Authors:  Alan D Castel; Jay Pratt; Fergus I M Craik
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-08

2.  Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention.

Authors:  Tirin Moore; Mazyar Fallah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Transsaccadic integration of visual features in a line intersection task.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Matthias Niemeier; J D Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques.

Authors:  J S Baizer; L G Ungerleider; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement.

Authors:  H Deubel; W X Schneider; B Bridgeman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Transsaccadic processing: stability, integration, and the potential role of remapping.

Authors:  Emily Higgins; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The same-location cost is unrelated to attentional settings: an object-updating account.

Authors:  Tomer Carmel; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; B Subramaniam
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

10.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; L M Jerreat; A L Burak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  19 in total

1.  Visual and verbal working memory loads interfere with scene-viewing.

Authors:  Deborah A Cronin; Candace E Peacock; John M Henderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Switching attention from internal to external information processing: A review of the literature and empirical support of the resource sharing account.

Authors:  Sam Verschooren; Sebastian Schindler; Rudi De Raedt; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-04

3.  Dissociable Decoding of Spatial Attention and Working Memory from EEG Oscillations and Sustained Potentials.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Visuospatial Working Memory as a Fundamental Component of the Eye Movement System.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-03-20

5.  People are better at maintaining positive than negative emotional states.

Authors:  Christian E Waugh; Kristin E Running; Olivia C Reynolds; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2018-03-22

6.  Feature-based guidance of attention during post-saccadic selection.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Michi Matsukura
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Measuring memory is harder than you think: How to avoid problematic measurement practices in memory research.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Maria M Robinson; Jamal R Williams; John T Wixted
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-10-19

8.  Covert shifts of attention can account for the functional role of "eye movements to nothing".

Authors:  Agnes Scholz; Anja Klichowicz; Josef F Krems
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

9.  Visual short-term memory for overtly attended objects during infancy.

Authors:  Aaron G Beckner; Lisa M Cantrell; Michaela C DeBolt; Marisa Martinez; Steven J Luck; Lisa M Oakes
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2020-03-31

10.  Shared processing in multiple object tracking and visual working memory in the absence of response order and task order confounds.

Authors:  Mark D Lapierre; Simon J Cropper; Piers D L Howe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.