Literature DB >> 32113282

Noise-induced enhancement of envelope following responses in normal-hearing adults.

Curtis J Billings1, Samuel Y Gordon1, Garnett P McMillan1, Frederick J Gallun1, Michelle R Molis1, Dawn Konrad-Martin1.   

Abstract

Measures of signal-in-noise neural encoding may improve understanding of the hearing-in-noise difficulties experienced by many individuals in everyday life. Usually noise results in weaker envelope following responses (EFRs); however, some studies demonstrate EFR enhancements. This experiment tested whether noise-induced enhancements in EFRs are demonstrated with simple 500- and 1000-Hz pure tones amplitude modulated at 110 Hz. Most of the 12 young normal-hearing participants demonstrated enhanced encoding of the 110-Hz fundamental in a noise background compared to quiet; in contrast, responses at the harmonics were decreased in noise relative to quiet conditions. Possible mechanisms of such an enhancement are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32113282      PMCID: PMC7030976          DOI: 10.1121/10.0000627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 2.  Auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Peggy Korczak; Jennifer Smart; Rafael Delgado; Theresa M Strobel; Christina Bradford
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Multiple auditory steady state responses (80-101 Hz): effects of ear, gender, handedness, intensity and modulation rate.

Authors:  Terence W Picton; Patricia van Roon; M Sasha John
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Han-Gyol Yi; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.

Authors:  Marilyn Laroche; Hilmi R Dajani; François Prévost; André M Marcoux
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Cochlear initiation site of the frequency-following response: a study of patients with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  O Yamada; K Kodera; R F Hink; H Yamane
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1978 Nov-Dec

7.  Representation of steady-state vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  E D Young; M B Sachs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Terence W Picton; Andrew Dimitrijevic; Maria-Cecilia Perez-Abalo; Patricia Van Roon
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  The influence of noise type and level upon stochastic resonance in human audition.

Authors:  Dennis T Ries
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Noise tolerance in human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.

Authors:  Ximing Li; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.