Literature DB >> 29517492

Quantitative assessment of cervical softening during pregnancy in the Rhesus macaque with shear wave elasticity imaging.

Ivan M Rosado-Mendez1, Lindsey C Carlson, Kaitlin M Woo, Andrew P Santoso, Quinton W Guerrero, Mark L Palmeri, Helen Feltovich, Timothy J Hall.   

Abstract

Abnormal parturition, e.g. pre- or post-term birth, is associated with maternal and neonatal morbidity and increased economic burden. This could potentially be prevented by accurate detection of abnormal softening of the uterine cervix. Shear wave elasticity imaging (SWEI) techniques that quantify tissue softness, such as shear wave speed (SWS) measurement, are promising for evaluation of the cervix. Still, interpretation of results can be complicated by biological variability (i.e. spatial variations of cervix stiffness, parity), as well as by experimental factors (i.e. type of transducer, posture during scanning). Here we investigated the ability of SWEI to detect cervical softening, as well as sources of SWS variability that can affect this task, in the pregnant and nonpregnant Rhesus macaque. Specifically, we evaluated SWS differences when imaging the cervix transabdominally with a typical linear array abdominal transducer, and transrectally with a prototype intracavitary linear array transducer. Linear mixed effects (LME) models were used to model SWS as a function of menstrual cycle day (in nonpregnant animals) and gestational age (in pregnant animals). Other variables included parity, shear wave direction, and cervix side (anterior versus posterior). In the nonpregnant cervix, the LME model indicated that SWS increased by 2% (95% confidence interval 0-3%) per day, starting eight days before menstruation. During pregnancy, SWS significantly decreased at a rate of 6% (95% CI 5-7%) per week (intracavitary approach) and 3% (95% CI 2-4%) per week (transabdominal approach), and interactions between the scanning approach and other fixed effects were also significant. These results suggest that, while absolute SWS values are influenced by factors such as scanning approach and SWEI implementation, these sources of variability do not compromise the sensitivity of SWEI to cervical softening. Our results also highlight the importance of standardizing SWEI approaches to improve their accuracy for cervical assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29517492      PMCID: PMC5908736          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aab532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  46 in total

1.  Assessment of the Cervix in Pregnant Women Using Shear Wave Elastography: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Marie Muller; Dora Aït-Belkacem; Mahdieh Hessabi; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Gilles Grangé; François Goffinet; Edouard Lecarpentier; Dominique Cabrol; Mickaël Tanter; Vassilis Tsatsaris
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Cervical Evaluation: From Ancient Medicine to Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Helen Feltovich
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Investigating the mechanical function of the cervix during pregnancy using finite element models derived from high-resolution 3D MRI.

Authors:  M Fernandez; M House; S Jambawalikar; N Zork; J Vink; R Wapner; K Myers
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 1.763

4.  Failed labor induction: toward an objective diagnosis.

Authors:  Dwight J Rouse; Steven J Weiner; Steven L Bloom; Michael W Varner; Catherine Y Spong; Susan M Ramin; Steve N Caritis; William A Grobman; Yoram Sorokin; Anthony Sciscione; Marshall W Carpenter; Brian M Mercer; John M Thorp; Fergal D Malone; Margaret Harper; Jay D Iams; Garland D Anderson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 3: liver.

Authors:  Giovanna Ferraioli; Carlo Filice; Laurent Castera; Byung Ihn Choi; Ioan Sporea; Stephanie R Wilson; David Cosgrove; Christoph F Dietrich; Dominique Amy; Jeffrey C Bamber; Richard Barr; Yi-Hong Chou; Hong Ding; Andre Farrokh; Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Timothy J Hall; Kazutaka Nakashima; Kathryn R Nightingale; Mark L Palmeri; Fritz Schafer; Tsuyoshi Shiina; Shinichi Suzuki; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  A Metin Gülmezoglu; Caroline A Crowther; Philippa Middleton; Emer Heatley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

7.  Effect of hormonal variation on Raman spectra for cervical disease detection.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Kanter; Shovan Majumder; Gary J Kanter; Emily M Woeste; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network.

Authors:  J D Iams; R L Goldenberg; P J Meis; B M Mercer; A Moawad; A Das; E Thom; D McNellis; R L Copper; F Johnson; J M Roberts
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-02-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Collagen Fiber Orientation and Dispersion in the Upper Cervix of Non-Pregnant and Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Wang Yao; Yu Gan; Kristin M Myers; Joy Y Vink; Ronald J Wapner; Christine P Hendon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Cervical elastography during pregnancy: clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Malgorzata Swiatkowska-Freund; Krzysztof Preis
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-04-21
View more
  4 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of cervical softening during pregnancy with shear wave elasticity imaging: an in vivo longitudinal study.

Authors:  Lindsey C Carlson; Timothy J Hall; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lu Mao; Helen Feltovich
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Clinical application of cervical shear wave elastography in predicting the risk of preterm delivery in DCDA twin pregnancy.

Authors:  Jimei Sun; Nan Li; Wei Jian; Dingya Cao; Junying Yang; Min Chen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 3.  Why Are Viscosity and Nonlinearity Bound to Make an Impact in Clinical Elastographic Diagnosis?

Authors:  Guillermo Rus; Inas H Faris; Jorge Torres; Antonio Callejas; Juan Melchor
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Shear wave dispersion as a potential biomarker for cervical remodeling during pregnancy: evidence from a non-human primate model.

Authors:  Abel Torres; Mark L Palmeri; Helen Feltovich; Timothy J Hall; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2021-02-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.