Literature DB >> 26719596

The Renaissance of Transcervical Balloon Catheters for Cervical Ripening and Labour Induction.

W Rath1, S Kehl2.   

Abstract

Due to rising rates of labour induction in industrialised countries, safe and effective methods of induction have once again become a focus of interest and research. Prostaglandins are effective for cervical ripening and induction of uterine contractions. They do, however, cause overstimulation of the uterus in up to 20 % of cases, sometimes causing changes in fetal heart rate. Transcervical balloon catheters provide an alternative to prostaglandins for labour induction and have been used for this purpose for almost 50 years. This induction method has experienced a recent renaissance in clinical practice that is reflected in an annually rising number of publications on its use. Balloon catheters allow gentle ripening of the cervix without causing uterine overstimulation. The two catheters available are the Foley catheter (off-label use) and the double balloon catheter, which is licensed for use in induction of labour. Both are as effective as prostaglandins, and do not increase the risk of infection to mother or child. Catheter induction also requires less monitoring compared to prostaglandins resulting in improved patient satisfaction. Balloon catheters provide a useful and promising option to achieve vaginal delivery despite failed prostaglandin induction. Intravenous oxytocin is nevertheless required in up to 85 % of cases for adequate induction/augmentation of contractions. Balloon catheters, vaginal PGE2 and misoprostol are equally effective in the context of an unripe/unfavourable cervix, the rate of uterine hyperstimulation being significantly lower, and the need for oxytocin significantly higher for catheters. Balloon catheters are increasingly being used in combination or sequentially with oral/vaginal misoprostol, although there is currently inadequate published data on the subject. International guidelines recommend the use of balloon catheters for labour induction with an unripe cervix (also following previous caesarean section) as an alternative to prostaglandins, particularly when these are not available or are contraindicated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  balloon catheter; effectiveness; labour induction; prostaglandins; safety

Year:  2015        PMID: 26719596      PMCID: PMC4678052          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  55 in total

1.  A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening.

Authors:  Roni Levy; Bibi Kanengiser; Boris Furman; Alon Ben Arie; Dov Brown; Zion J Hagay
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone.

Authors:  A Babatunde Ande; C Michael Ezeanochie; N Biodun Olagbuji
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 3.  Non-hormonal methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Chi Eung Danforn Lim; Rachel Wai Chung Ng; Ke Xu
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study.

Authors:  Antonella Cromi; Fabio Ghezzi; Massimo Agosti; Maurizio Serati; Stefano Uccella; Veronica Arlant; Pierfrancesco Bolis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.

Authors:  Chuying Du; Yukun Liu; Yinglin Liu; Hong Ding; Rui Zhang; Jianping Tan
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 6.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marta Jozwiak; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp; Anthony J Kelly; Ben Willem J Mol; Olivier Irion; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-03-14

Review 7.  Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  N S Fox; D H Saltzman; A S Roman; C K Klauser; E Moshier; A Rebarber
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Sreelakshmi Lanka; Tarakeswari Surapaneni; Praveen K Nirmalan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  Induction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: the PROBAAT-II study, a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mieke L G Ten Eikelder; Femke Neervoort; Katrien Oude Rengerink; Gert J van Baaren; Marta Jozwiak; Jan-Willem de Leeuw; Irene de Graaf; Maria G van Pampus; Maureen Franssen; Martijn Oudijk; Paulien van der Salm; Mallory Woiski; Paula Jm Pernet; A Hanneke Feitsma; Huib van Vliet; Martina Porath; Frans Roumen; Erik van Beek; Hans Versendaal; Marion Heres; Ben Willem J Mol; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol.

Authors:  Hillary Bracken; Shuchita Mundle; Brian Faragher; Thomas Easterling; Alan Haycox; Mark Turner; Zarko Alfirevic; Beverly Winikoff; Andrew Weeks
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  8 in total

1.  A snapshot of women's and clinicians' perceptions of the double balloon catheter for induction of labor.

Authors:  Sarah Waldron; Hannah Contziu; Olga Aleshin; Hala Phipps
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 2.  Review of Evidence-Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction.

Authors:  Nicole Carlson; Jessica Ellis; Katie Page; Alexis Dunn Amore; Julia Phillippi
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.891

3.  Hygroscopic dilators vs balloon catheter ripening of the cervix for induction of labor in nulliparous women at term: Retrospective study.

Authors:  Ryosuke Shindo; Shigeru Aoki; Naohiro Yonemoto; Yuriko Yamamoto; Junko Kasai; Michi Kasai; Etsuko Miyagi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Induction of labour with sequential double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone in obese women.

Authors:  Sven Kehl; Tilman Born; Christel Weiss; Florian Faschingbauer; Jutta Pretscher; Matthias W Beckmann; Marc Sütterlin; Ulf Dammer
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-05-01

5.  MEchanical DIlatation of the Cervix-- in a Scarred uterus (MEDICS): the study protocol of a randomised controlled trial comparing a single cervical catheter balloon and prostaglandin PGE2 for cervical ripening and labour induction following caesarean delivery.

Authors:  Soe-Na Choo; Abhiram Kanneganti; Muhammad Nur Dinie Bin Abdul Aziz; Leta Loh; Carol Hargreaves; Vikneswaran Gopal; Arijit Biswas; Yiong Huak Chan; Ida Suzani Ismail; Claudia Chi; Citra Mattar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Outpatient Induction of Labor - Are Balloon Catheters an Appropriate Method?

Authors:  Werner Rath; Patrick Stelzl; Sven Kehl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12 h versus within 12-24 h.

Authors:  Jing Peng; Ruobing Li; Shuguo Du; Heng Yin; Min Li; Xuan Zheng; Shiyao Wu; Yun Zhao
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Comparing the effects of vaginal misoprostol, laminaria, and extra amniotic saline infusion on cervical ripening and induction of labor.

Authors:  Zohreh Tabasi; Elaheh Mesdaghinia; Masoumeh Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi; Mojtaba Sehat; Aida Panahandeh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2020-03-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.