Literature DB >> 21248088

Screening for urinary tract infection with the Sysmex UF-1000i urine flow cytometer.

Maarten A C Broeren1, Semiha Bahçeci, Huib L Vader, Niek L A Arents.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) by urine culture is time-consuming and can produce up to 60 to 80% negative results. Fast screening methods that can reduce the necessity for urine cultures will have a large impact on overall turnaround time and laboratory economics. We have evaluated the detection of bacteria and leukocytes by a new urine analyzer, the UF-1000i, to identify negative urine samples that can be excluded from urine culture. In total, 1,577 urine samples were analyzed and compared to urine culture. Urine culture showed growth of ≥10(3) CFU/ml in 939 samples (60%). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and ROC decision plots were been prepared at three different gold standard definitions of a negative urine culture: no growth, growth of bacteria at <10(4) CFU/ml, and growth of bacteria at <10(5) CFU/ml. Also, the reduction in urine cultures and the percentage of false negatives were calculated. At the most stringent gold standard definition of no growth, a chosen sensitivity of 95% resulted in a cutoff value of 26 bacteria/μl, a specificity of 43% and a reduction in urine cultures of only 20%, of which 14% were false negatives. However, at a gold standard definition of <10(5) CFU/ml and a sensitivity of 95%, the UF-1000i cutoff value was 230 bacteria/μl, the specificity was 80%, and the reduction in urine cultures was 52%, of which 0.3% were false negatives. The applicability of the UF-1000i to screen for negative urine samples strongly depends on population characteristics and the definition of a negative urine culture. In our setting, however, the low workload savings and the high percentage of false-negative results do not warrant the UF-1000i to be used as a screening analyzer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21248088      PMCID: PMC3067737          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01669-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  22 in total

1.  Unsatisfactory performance of flow cytometer UF-100 and urine strips in predicting outcome of urine cultures.

Authors:  Z Zaman; S Roggeman; J Verhaegen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Urine analysis performed by flow cytometry: reference range determination and comparison to morphological findings, dipstick chemistry and bacterial culture results--a multicenter study.

Authors:  A Regeniter; V Haenni; L Risch; H P Köchli; J P Colombo; R Frei; A R Huber
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 0.975

3.  Determination of cut-off values for leucocytes and bacteria for urine flow cytometer (UF-100) in urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Tulay Koken; Orhan C Aktepe; Mustafa Serteser; Murat Samli; Ahmet Kahraman; Nurhan Dogan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Urine particle evaluation: a comparison between the UF-1000i and quantitative microscopy.

Authors:  Fabio Manoni; Agostino Tinello; Lucia Fornasiero; Paolo Hoffer; Valeria Temporin; Sara Valverde; Gianluca Gessoni
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Management of urinary tract infections in adults.

Authors:  W E Stamm; T M Hooton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Detection of significant bacteriuria by automated urinalysis using flow cytometry.

Authors:  H Okada; Y Sakai; S Miyazaki; S Arakawa; Y Hamaguchi; S Kamidono
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Does this woman have an acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection?

Authors:  Stephen Bent; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; David L Simel; Stephan D Fihn; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs.

Authors:  Betsy Foxman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2002-07-08       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Field evaluation of a second-generation cytometer UF-100 in diagnosis of acute urinary tract infections in adult patients.

Authors:  F Manoni; S Valverde; F Antico; M M Salvadego; A Giacomini; G Gessoni
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 10.  The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy.

Authors:  Walter L J M Devillé; Joris C Yzermans; Nico P van Duijn; P Dick Bezemer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 2.264

View more
  32 in total

1.  Selective detection of bacteria in urine with a long-range surface plasmon waveguide biosensor.

Authors:  Paul Béland; Oleksiy Krupin; Pierre Berini
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Interlaboratory Collaboration for Optimized Screening for Urinary Tract Infection.

Authors:  Anne Russcher; Elske Kusters; Ron Wolterbeek; Ed J Kuijper; Christa M Cobbaert; Martha T van der Beek
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Urine flow cytometry is an adequate screening tool for urinary tract infections in children.

Authors:  Maarten Broeren; Rélana Nowacki; Feico Halbertsma; Nicolaas Arents; Sebastiaan Zegers
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Comparative evaluation of Vitek 2 identification and susceptibility testing of urinary tract pathogens directly and isolated from chromogenic media.

Authors:  M J Munoz-Dávila; M Roig; G Yagüe; A Blázquez; C Salvador; M Segovia
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Detection of significant bacteriuria by use of the iQ200 automated urine microscope.

Authors:  Enno Stürenburg; Jan Kramer; Gerhard Schön; Georg Cachovan; Ingo Sobottka
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Pseudo-outbreak of extremely drug-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa urinary tract infections due to contamination of an automated urine analyzer.

Authors:  M Hallin; A Deplano; S Roisin; V Boyart; R De Ryck; C Nonhoff; B Byl; Y Glupczynski; O Denis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Rapid urine preparation prior to identification of uropathogens by MALDI-TOF MS.

Authors:  L Veron; S Mailler; V Girard; B H Muller; G L'Hostis; C Ducruix; A Lesenne; A Richez; H Rostaing; V Lanet; S Ghirardi; A van Belkum; F Mallard
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 8.  New and developing diagnostic technologies for urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Michael Davenport; Kathleen E Mach; Linda M Dairiki Shortliffe; Niaz Banaei; Tza-Huei Wang; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Evaluation of BiesseBioscreen as a new methodology for bacteriuria screening.

Authors:  Eleonora Nicolai; Simona Garau; Cartesio Favalli; Cartesio D'Agostini; Enrico Gratton; Guido Motolese; Nicola Rosato
Journal:  New Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.479

10.  Rapid Screening of Urinary Tract Infection and Discrimination of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria by Automated Flow Cytometric Analysis Using Sysmex UF-5000.

Authors:  Seon Young Kim; Yumi Park; Hyunjin Kim; Jimyung Kim; Sun Hoe Koo; Gye Cheol Kwon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.