Literature DB >> 29077216

No difference between mechanical perturbation training with compliant surface and manual perturbation training on knee functional performance after ACL rupture.

Zakariya Nawasreh1, David Logerstedt2,3, Mathew Failla4, Lynn Snyder-Mackler3,4,5.   

Abstract

Manual perturbation training improves dynamic knee stability and functional performance after anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ACL-rupture). However, it is limited to static standing position and does not allow time-specific perturbations at different phase of functional activities. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether administering mechanical perturbation training including compliant surface provides effects similar to manual perturbation training on knee functional measures after an acute ACL-rupture. Sixteen level I/II athletes with ACL-ruptures participated in this preliminary study. Eight patients received mechanical (Mechanical) and eight subjects received manual perturbation training (Manual). All patients completed a functional testing (isometric quadriceps strength, single-legged hop tests) and patient-reported measures (Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS), Global Rating Score (GRS), International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 (IKDC 2000) at pre- and post-training. 2 × 2 ANOVA was used for data analysis. No significant group-by-time interactions were found for all measures (p > 0.18). Main effects of time were found for single hop (Pre-testing: 85.14% ± 21.07; Post-testing: 92.49% ± 17.55), triple hop (Pre-testing: 84.64% ± 14.17; Post-testing: 96.64% ± 11.14), KOS-ADLS (Pre-testing: 81.13% ± 11.12; Post-testing: 88.63% ± 12.63), GRS (Pre-testing: 68.63% ± 15.73; Post-testing: 78.81% ± 13.85), and IKDC 2000 (Pre-testing: 66.66% ± 9.85; Post-testing: 76.05% ± 14.62) (p < 0.032). Administering mechanical perturbation training using compliant surfaces induce effects similar to manual perturbation training on knee functional performance after acute ACL-rupture. The clinical significance is both modes of training improve patients' functional-performance and limb-to-limb movement symmetry, and enhancing the patients' self-reported of knee functional measures after ACL rupture. Mechanical perturbation that provides a compliant surface might be utilized as part of the ACL rehabilitation training.
© 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1391-1397, 2018. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29077216      PMCID: PMC5924420          DOI: 10.1002/jor.23784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  38 in total

1.  Reactive balance adjustments to unexpected perturbations during human walking.

Authors:  Reed Ferber; Louis R Osternig; Marjorie H Woollacott; Noah J Wasielewski; Ji-Hang Lee
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Functional assessment and muscle strength before and after reconstruction of chronic anterior cruciate ligament lesions.

Authors:  Suzanne N de Jong; Danny R van Caspel; Michiel J van Haeff; Daniël B F Saris
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Perturbation training improves knee kinematics and reduces muscle co-contraction after complete unilateral anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  Terese L Chmielewski; Wendy J Hurd; Katherine S Rudolph; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-08

4.  Time series analysis of postural responses to combined visual pitch and support surface tilt.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Richard Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Perturbation-enhanced neuromuscular training alters muscle activity in female athletes.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Terese L Chmielewski; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee.

Authors:  J J Irrgang; L Snyder-Mackler; R S Wainner; F H Fu; C D Harner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Time line for noncopers to pass return-to-sports criteria after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Erin H Hartigan; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Interaction of leg stiffness and surfaces stiffness during human hopping.

Authors:  D P Ferris; C T Farley
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1997-01

9.  Preoperative quadriceps strength is a significant predictor of knee function two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  I Eitzen; I Holm; M A Risberg
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Gait patterns differ between ACL-reconstructed athletes who pass return-to-sport criteria and those who fail.

Authors:  Stephanie L Di Stasi; David Logerstedt; Emily S Gardinier; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  1 in total

1.  THE EFFECT OF TRAINING ON A COMPLIANT SURFACE ON MUSCLE ACTIVATION AND CO-CONTRACTION AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURY.

Authors:  Zakariya H Nawasreh; Adam R Marmon; David Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.