Literature DB >> 21233427

Manufacturing credibility: the National Energy Management Institute and the Tobacco Institute's strategy for indoor air quality.

Richard B Campbell1, Edith D Balbach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We studied tobacco industry efforts during the 1980s and 1990s to promote the National Energy Management Institute (NEMI), a nonprofit organization, as an authority on indoor air quality as part of the industry's strategy to oppose smoke-free worksite policies.
METHODS: We analyzed tobacco industry documents, conducted literature searches in Lexis-Nexis for background and historical literature, and reviewed relevant public health and policy literature.
RESULTS: The tobacco industry provided more than US $6 million to NEMI to establish it as an authority on indoor air quality and to work with it to undermine support for smoke-free air policies by promoting ventilation as a solution to indoor air quality problems. Tobacco industry support for NEMI was not publicly disclosed.
CONCLUSIONS: NEMI was a valuable ally for the tobacco industry through NEMI's ties to organized labor, its technical background, and its status as a third-party actor. NEMI also helped the industry to portray ventilation to improve overall indoor air quality and smoke-free worksites as an either-or choice; in fact, both can improve worker health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21233427      PMCID: PMC3036691          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.199695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  12 in total

Review 1.  The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies.

Authors:  M E Muggli; J L Forster; R D Hurt; J L Repace
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  What the public thinks about the tobacco industry and its products.

Authors:  M J Ashley; J E Cohen
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents.

Authors:  J Drope; S Chapman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  Tobacco industry manipulation of research.

Authors:  Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 6.  Legislating "sound science": the role of the tobacco industry.

Authors:  Annamaria Baba; Daniel M Cook; Thomas O McGarity; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public places.

Authors:  J V Dearlove; S A Bialous; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Indoor air pollution: a public health perspective.

Authors:  J D Spengler; K Sexton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-07-01       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Political coalitions for mutual advantage: the case of the Tobacco Institute's Labor Management Committee.

Authors:  Edith D Balbach; Elizabeth M Barbeau; Viola Manteufel; Jocelyn Pan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Building alliances in unlikely places: progressive allies and the Tobacco Institute's coalition strategy on cigarette excise taxes.

Authors:  Richard B Campbell; Edith D Balbach
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Evidence Regarding the Impact of Conflicts of Interest on Environmental and Occupational Health Research.

Authors:  Ellen M Wells
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-06

Review 2.  Protecting the world from secondhand tobacco smoke exposure: where do we stand and where do we go from here?

Authors:  Joaquin Barnoya; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Capturing complexity: Mixing methods in the analysis of a European tobacco control policy network.

Authors:  Heide Weishaar; Amanda Amos; Jeff Collin
Journal:  Int J Soc Res Methodol       Date:  2015

4.  Unpacking commercial sector opposition to European smoke-free policy: lack of unity, 'fear of association' and harm reduction debates.

Authors:  Heide Weishaar; Amanda Amos; Jeff Collin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 7.552

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.